You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: But to get to a position where that threat would have substance [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. But to get to a position where that threat would have substance
they would have to make a massive public issue about a split among Democrats, which would seriously weaken the president's appeal among the public. I mean, the elections of 1968 and 1980 are hardly models to emulate.

As for point 4, this is not an argument I'm inclined to get very far into at the moment, but I think that progressives too often attribute to trade policy what would be more aptly attributed to capitalism's general practice--especially with the shift to the right in US economic policy since the 1970s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC