You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Cable channels available this way are just the internet feeds of those channels [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Cable channels available this way are just the internet feeds of those channels
They also make past shows/segments available. It's not a substitute for cable if you want all the cable channels, (I don't care about that myself) but the main caveat is that when someone speaks of watching MSNBC or Al Jazeera English, or CNN International live, it's just the internet stream. In other words the video quality is very low. But if you don't want to pay the cable company month after month for 200 lousy channels of crud just to tune in a couple of news channels, then having a Roku is a great deal. In addition to music services like Pandora, and video streaming from Netflix, HuluPlus, Amazon (which all require subscriptions) you can get free live internet access to all the cable news channels via "private channels" like JustinTV and Nowhere TV. Nowhere TV is how I added the live feed of BBC TV news to my Roku. The so-called private channels that aggregate live feeds are not listed in the Roku channel store for one reason or another. Newscaster and Mediafly are two channels that can be found in the official Roku channel store that enable me to watch Al Jazeera English service live and podcasts of Democracy Now.

With all these news channels available through the internet and collected one way or another through the Roku for my TV, I can live happily without cable tv. For someone else who wants more of what cabletv offers, like HBO for example or, someone who just wants to look at Chris Matthews' face in HD, a Roku would not be a substitute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC