Reply #48: It would be a logical fallacy but the strategy seems to be more [View All]

[TheKentuckian]

like one extreme is essentially correct and his mission is to get the other "extreme" to accept the other's general ideology by throwing in some bones and using the threat of the other extreme to make them tolerate the oppositions basic premises.

He is not "splitting the difference" and arriving at the center of the political spectrum. He is deep in right field and using those deeper and on the other side of the fence as a stick to make deep right seem alright. The reality is to be more extreme than our regressive party you probably have to go to theocracy or unleash the monarchs. There is so much room on the other side of what he is using as the other extreme that you cannot find another governing party more conservative in the west except for our regressive party. In most of the west our "extreme" would be around center and at times bee seen as conservative.

I don't know what the "center" between radical regressive and conservative is but I'm pretty sure it far right in orientation.

The Teabaggers as a mile marker is crazy and I begin to believe a set up.