You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Great article. The private sector costs a lot more and does worse. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great article. The private sector costs a lot more and does worse.
One area I've thought about is military services.

When we did those jobs in-house, our soldiers got valuable job training for when they left the service. They learned how to cook for hundreds of people, how to do the electrical wiring on base, etc. So our tax dollars served a double purpose-- helping our military effort and providing job training.

Soldiers also had to be focused on quality control because they needed to answer to their supervising officers.

Therefore it was painful to read of privatized military contractors serving moldy food to our soldiers and electrocuting them in their showers with faulty wiring.

And there is so much profiteering in our military privatization. I remember when most of our legislators, Democrats included, were cleverly incited into screaming for the defunding of ACORN because of the right wing's theater of possible fraud. Alan Grayson and some others suggested that if our legislators were in favor of cutting ACORN off because of suspected fraud, they really should stop dealing with military contractors ALREADY convicted of fraud.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/22/whoops-anti-acorn-bill-ro_n_294949.html

The congressional legislation intended to defund ACORN, passed with broad bipartisan support, is written so broadly that it applies to "any organization" that has been charged with breaking federal or state election laws, lobbying disclosure laws, campaign finance laws or filing fraudulent paperwork with any federal or state agency. It also applies to any of the employees, contractors or other folks affiliated with a group charged with any of those things.

In other words, the bill could plausibly defund the entire military-industrial complex. Whoops.

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) picked up on the legislative overreach and asked the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) to sift through its database to find which contractors might be caught in the ACORN net.

Lockheed Martin and Northrop Gumman both popped up quickly, with 20 fraud cases between them, and the longer list is a Who's Who of weapons manufacturers and defense contractors.


http://www.contractormisconduct.org/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC