You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: This would do nothing but accelerate the concentration of wealth into fewer hands. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. This would do nothing but accelerate the concentration of wealth into fewer hands.
Edited on Sat Oct-08-11 01:05 PM by kenny blankenship
As others have already said, vacant property is taxed already. Raising a surtax on vacant properties in addition to existing property taxes would distress property values further by forcing sales from weaker to stronger hands, and would therefore serve to concentrate land ownership in the hands of banks (further). I thought we all agreed that highly concentrated land ownership/landlordship was a bad, more or less oligarchical idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC