You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #169: The "interesting" part was that the figure of $29K was specifically [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #53
169. The "interesting" part was that the figure of $29K was specifically
adhered to, as the rules for oversight change at $30K of repairs. Clever, yes?

When scamming the government out of money is more profitable than doing your business, management will change the business model to the one that a) costs less to run, and b) makes more money; after all, "everyone else" is doing it, so....

Sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC