Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Oakland) Gang injunction defendant arrested in gun case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:17 PM
Original message
(Oakland) Gang injunction defendant arrested in gun case
(05-20) 18:23 PDT OAKLAND --

A man named in Oakland's proposed civil gang injunction in the Fruitvale neighborhood was arrested for allegedly trying to sell two assault weapons, authorities said Friday.

Joseph Coombs, 37, believed he was selling two high-powered assault weapons as part of a street deal, police said. But it was actually Oakland police who arranged the purchase in a sting operation, said Cynthia Perkins, a department spokeswoman.

Acting on a tip, officers set up a transaction with Coombs on Thursday to buy the two weapons - an AK-47 and a Mac-10 - on Cuthbert Avenue, police said.

Coombs was arrested about 5:30 p.m. The two weapons were recovered, police said.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/05/20/BAVM1JJ2AB.DTL

So do you think that the injunction will continue to be effective in suppressing guns and preventing violent crimes?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. High powered
Not to get too technical accurate in a gun geek sort of way, but high powered is not an accurate description of either one. If you are interested in why, PM me.
Since he is a felon in possession, his happy ass should be in federal court facing the mandatory min of five years. That is the one thing NRA and Brady agree on. Google Project Exile.
But as usual, some local DA will plead it out on some bullshit local charge. Been the problem since enacted in the 1930s.
It might be effective in getting guns off the black market, I hope. Since 90 percent of violent crimes do not involve guns, not really. That number includes violent crime other than homicide, in case you are wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC