mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-30-08 09:09 PM
Original message |
so, whatcha all think about the con con? |
|
much as i would like to wave a magic wand and fix a couple things in our constitution, i am just a little leery of some of the folks who would actually be waving the wands on this one.
discuss.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The people writing it will be the people we vote for. Don't buy into the special interest scare tactics.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. i'm not buying into anything. i haven't really heard jack about it. |
|
i came to that conclusion all by my little self.
i do understand the process. but i also know that the people who end up on the ballot are not going to be picked out of thin air. i seriously do not know how i will vote.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Its one of the main arguments |
|
used by the corporate backed opposition front groups. The people on the ballot will be the ones who choose to run and I'm sure there will be many people interested who aren't part of the current system. This is the best and most likely chance and fundamental reform to change the system we have now. Special interests want things to stay the same because they have power in the current system and don't want to risk a change.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. well, it doesn't take a lot of research to come to the conclusion that |
|
in illinois, large amounts of power can and do fall into the wrong hands. anywhere else, i guess.
if you have links to groups on either side, i would be interested to read them. but again, good people will no doubt run. but the connected will always have the advantage. and iirc, the last con con didn't produce the kind of changes that were hoped for.
i am open minded, just a little cynical.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-08-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. The current system benefits those with power and money. |
|
Its designed for their benefit. That's why we need a new constitution. We have a much better chance at changing that system through a con-con than without one.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-08-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
make the world go round, friend. it is the human animal. it is who we are. changing the rules will do nothing to change human nature. the way to change "the system" is to get in it and win it. do you have a local dfa? join it. no? start one. the one on the northside of chicago is working hard to elect progressives at every level, which is what you need to change the system. don't let either party have a monopoly on who gets on the ballot in the first place. actual contested primaries is where the rubber meets the road.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-09-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. In post four you thought |
|
the system was so great that there's no point voting for a con-con because the people in power now will make sure nothing good happens. The fact that the two parties have a monopoly over who gets on the ballot is a legal issues in a system rigged for the special interests. We're playing a game rigged to benefit the other side and this is the chance to make a more level playing field.
|
olkaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-03-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't like who will be doing it. If there is a different way to implement a mechanism for recall, I'd support that.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-08-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. You don't like the voters? |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-08-08 01:17 PM by Radical Activist
All changes will be up for a vote by all citizens.
The only other way to get recall or other major reforms is to get the general assembly to vote to put it on the ballot. Fat chance.
|
olkaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-12-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. Nope, don't like the voters. |
|
So, I don't know where that leaves me.
|
Doug 1973
(17 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-10-08 02:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
If anything it will bring up important issues and give some well needed attention to things like campaign finance reform, executive term limits, property tax reform, etc.
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-11-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Is there any promises that the social conservatives won't swoop in? |
|
And make mischief with such things as abortion and same-sex marriage?
|
murielm99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-12-08 03:07 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Where will we get the 78 million dollars that it may cost? |
|
The current constitution can be amended.
|
skorpo
(300 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-13-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
One of the changes that the CON-CON will provide is the TAXING ALL PENSIONS in the State of Illinois.
To all my retired friends and those that will retire in the future, get the word out to vote NO!!!!! For those of us that get municipal pensions, our Social Security is already cut, thank you Dan Rostenkowski. Do not let the State tax our pensions.
Tell all your Illinois friends that on Nov. 4th vote NO to CON-CON.
Let's get the word out.
Thanks for you help.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message |