Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Minnesota Governor Straw

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 12:41 PM
Original message
Poll question: Minnesota Governor Straw
Who ya voting for? Why - if you want to add.

We have a good thread on who will win:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=160x39831




I'm leaning Dayton but would love to see someone with some passion for either Entenza or Kehliher try to convince me otherwise. I always include Ole (Savior) in polls for any race he runs in... :-)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I caucused for MAK.
After the primary, my support goes to whoever wins. Entenza is too focused on a single issue, I think, ending NCLB. He hasn't presented a broad enough campaign, IMO. Margaret is an effective legislative leader, and much will need to be done in the legislature. Dayton is OK, but by not accepting the results of the DFL endorsement and not participating in the caucus and convention system, he alienated a bunch of folks. Still, after tomorrow, whoever wins will have everyone's support. Emmer is simply not an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is not the first time Dayton skipped the endorsing convention
and I don't think it alienates nearly as many people as the DFL hierarchy likes to think.

I know quite a few party hacks who hold offices at the Senate District level who are planning to vote for him tomorrow - while ducking calls from Kelliher's campaign to help with GOTV. (Though all the party requires is that you not openly work against the endorsed candidate).

Kelliher got the endorsement because of the super delegates and, as the rumor goes, because Entenza when he dropped out at the convention told his delegates to vote for MAK because he saw her as the easier one to beat (though he didn't have enough delegates to make a difference, until they combined with the "super" delegates.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah. I wasn't at the state convention, but I heard a lot about it.
Anyhow, if Dayton takes the primary, he'll get the support of all the DFLers, so it doesn't matter all that much, probably. I don't think Entenza has any prayer, so I'm ignoring him. We'll find out soon enough, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You make a strong point that the communication with the legislature
will be critical. That is a persuasive argument for Margaret.

I don't blame Dayton for bypassing the endorsement process. The DFL has picked some lousy candidates and obviously they wouldn't have picked him.

I'll happily support any of the three but Entenza doesn't have a well enough articulated platform for me to get excited about at this juncture. I think he would, however, be a decent debate foe against Emmer. Of course, a debate between Gov candidates would have low impact on a race so my hope is Mark or Margaret get the nod tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. A friend of mine heard Entenza address a meeting of school social workers
She found him condescending and said that he told a sexist joke--in front of a mostly female audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Gotta disagree with you here.
In particular, on the "Margaret is an effective legislative leader." bit.

A couple of weeks ago, I ran into a friend of mine that works at the Capital. This friend is a diehard Dem but had absolutely nothing good to say about Kelliher. She said when the Dems get together to caucus, if someone disagrees with Kelliher, she cries. She had a number of other stories but suffice it to say, MAK is completely lacking in leadership skills. If she becomes governor, MN will really be up a creek.

Out of curiosity, I asked why MAK had gotten on the single-payer bandwagon. I had assumed it was because Dayton supports single-payer but apparently there's a little more to it than that. At the convention, John Marty did NOT want to give up. He fought until the end but finally gave in on one condition: that MAK support single-payer. But he wouldn't take her word for it. He got her to commit to it on paper AND he then distributed copies to everyone there. He didn't trust her enough to take her on her word. He had to have it in writing.

Mistrust seems to be a rather common thing where MAK is involved. My friend had a lot of other stories but unfortunately, I don't have time to go into details at the moment. I guess they'll have to wait until the next get-together.

On a further note, my friend said she was glad to hear that I would be voting in the primary but, even more important than that, was extremely relieved to know I wouldn't be voting for Kelliher. She said she hopes more people think like I do and can see through her facade. But the real shocker for me was when my friend said that if Kelliher wins in the primary, she'll be voting for Horner. I never, ever expected to hear her say something like because, like I said, she's a diehard Dem. But I guess that only goes so far and Kelliher is beyond those limits, even for a party faithful like my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bjb Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am also leaning towards Dayton
but will certainly support the winner no matter who it is. I thought it gutsy of Dayton to come right out and say he would raise taxes on the wealthy ( I agree with him.) However, I wonder if people who are in the upper bracket who are Democrats will not support him because of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Who?
All, what, four or five people in the upper bracket in MN?

Big f'n deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. A Small %
Dayton would raise taxes on the top 8% or so. 92% of taxpayers would not be effected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SomeGuyInEagan Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. On income or taxable income (after deductions)?
I haven't been able to find the answer.

But there is a great difference between your income and your taxable income if you have deductions for a home mortgage interest, property taxes, other taxes, childcare, healthcare, retirement, etc.

Can anyone point me to the answer?

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Randomthought Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would like to vote in your poll
but the Entenza ad is covering the vote link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I want to see Dayton kick Emmer's hiney. Take that, Target!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ComoParker Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Still Undecided
I'm still weighing each of the three and can't come to a decision. Here are the Pros and Cons as I see them. Any comments/suggestions are welcome:

Dayton
Pros
Outstate Support
$$
Seniors

Cons
Easy negatives for general (closing DC office)
Tax message though correct seems a little punative
I have trouble picturing him as our governor

MAK
Pros
Did well on the transportation bill
Support in the cities
Can get a crowd mildly excited

Cons
Rolled over after the unallotment decision
Hasn't articulated a clear plan
Can get a crowd mildly excited

Entenza
Pros
$$
Outreach to underrepresented communities
Decent vision
Held his ground against Pawlenty during the shutdown

Cons
Personality (see investigation of Hatch, Mike)
Easy negative target
Might be from Worthington, but not really from there anymore.

What do you all think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. One of your Dayton cons is a pro for me.
That he closed his office showed great concern on his part for his staff.

Further, I think there's a lot to that story that hasn't been told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ComoParker Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thanks
Fair point about his concern for his staff, though 99 others disagreeing seeming like an odd thing to me. Still sitting on the fence. Hoping for some sort of epiphany today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Congress was in recess at the time
the 99 who disageed with Dayton would all be safely out of town leaving only their staffs in peril (real or imagined). Memebers of the House were also out of town and, of course, DimSon was in Texas.

At the time Bushco was having one of their "all terra, all the time" spasms and were even implying it was not safe for tourists to go to D.C. I was never sure if Mark did this because he believed Bushco and was keeping his staff safe or if he was trying to call their bluff and say "If it's so dangerous why are government offices open?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. One correction here.
"MAK: Did well on the transportation bill."

A couple of weeks ago, I ran into a friend of mine that works at the Capital. She said Kelliher doesn't deserve any credit for getting the transportation bill passed. She told me who was responsible for getting the bill through (and of course, I promptly forgot his name) and said he's not really interested in taking the credit. He just wanted to get the job done. Kelliher, in the meantime, was largely MIA.

Just wanted to pass along that little bit of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ComoParker Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Interesting...I know Alice Hausman was pretty involved
and there was a GOP-er that pushed pretty hard, but I was always under the impression that MAK was in the middle of the slug-fest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'm sure that's the impression she wants people to have but
unfortunately it's just not true.

Coincidentally, I just had a conversation with a coworker and she knows someone that used to work for Kelliher. She said the person she knows can't stand her and will be voting for Dayton in the primary.

She also brought up another interesting reason to vote for Dayton: ambition. Dayton isn't looking to do anything except be governor. He doesn't have any political ambitions beyond that. However, Kelliher views the governership as merely a stepping stone on her way to higher office. Don't expect a huge list of accomplishments with her as governor since her main focus will be to further her own political career. She'll toe the line and pander to special interests because that's what's good for MAK. What's good for the state of MN will be thrown by the wayside once again. After 8 years of Pawlenty, that's the last thing this state needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Very good (and interesting) points n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. "Kelliher views the governership as merely a stepping stone on her way to higher office"
Which higher office?

Is she expecting to be president, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. There's always the Senate
should Al of Amy not run. Kelliher is relatively young, she could wait for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. Yep.
I don't know how long Al plans on being in the Senate but it's possible that he might decide to move on after one or two terms.

Amy, OTOH, will probably have to get voted out, hopefully soon. Can you imagine if MAK decided to primary Amy? That would be a perfect example of not having anyone to pick from. Princess, who would you vote for in that nightmare scenario? (I know how much you admire them both. ;) ) I'd have to leave that section of my ballot blank or do a write-in. No way could I ever cast a vote for either one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. If I HAD to choose between the 2 of them -
I'd go with Kelliher. Amy has had her chance & maybe MAK would at least hire a staff that was civil to anyone who called her office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. That's kind of what I figured. Thanks for being a sport. ;)
If I was forced to pick between the two (as in, if someone were holding a gun to my head), I'd probably go with Kelliher to get rid of Amy. I think Kelliher would implode pretty quickly so it would be easy to boot her out after one term. Amy, OTOH, seems to be rather firmly entrenched so it might be harder to get rid of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. President? Gawd, I would hope not.
No, probably the Senate, though maybe she would "settle" for the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
loveable liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. I was disappointed in Mark at the end of his Senatorial term....
He seemed to have given up and was waiting for his term to end. I thought about those days though with the scumbag Bill Frist Clown club in charge, there probably wasnt a whole lot a liberal could have done at the time. I'm betting he was plain worn out from not having any backup.

I vote for Mark. My parents are too. My mom says she sounds like Hillary (my mom is 70 so I figure she can say what she likes...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't like MAK.
She doesn't want to end the tax cuts for the rich. That really turns me off.

I like Dayton, and I'll be voting for him tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. None of them have gotten me fired up, which is unusual for a primary. Usually I've got it figured
out weeks in advance. Not this time. I know who I don't like, but I have trouble liking who's left. But then, I was pulling for Rukavina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PatSnow Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Decided to vote for Kelliher
I studied the sites of both Kelliher and Dayton. She had a 10 page detailed proposal,while he just had a one sentence of what he wants to do.

And, yes, I am concerned that the Republicans will run against him as setting Minnesota as the highest tax state in the nation.

Let's face it: this state elected Ventura - who decided there was too much money and sent money back to tax payers - and Pawlenty.

Many people moved to the state to take advantage of quality of life, but are unwilling to pay for it.

Interesting, did you know that there were four DFL candidates? Don't remember the name of the fourth who, by the way, was first listed, but his running mate is "Lady" Jayne something.

And, as we got our ballots we were warned not to cross party. Yeah, right. "Minnesota Nice." A Republican was not going to try to create havoc in DFL primaries, right?

Made sure that Ritchie and Swanson got my votes.

As for Park District commissioner - anyone running on "fiscal responsibility" is a suspect. One of them actually said in his webpage that he wants to show that "conservatives, too, can care about park." Yeah, right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Voting in more than one party column will invalidate
your vote. Your votes won't be counted: the machine will kick it out.

A stronger incentive than "MN nice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Sorry, I missed Peter Idusogie
in preparing this poll. I seemed to miss him in every other capacity, too. Never heard of him. Don't even recall seeing him on my ballot today, either. :shrug:

I can't believe I missed someone with a running mate named Lady Jayne.

Something tells me Peter isn't going to be a dark horse winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. They just meant that you couldn't mix and match parties in the various races
So that if you voted Republican in the gubernatorial race, you had to vote Republican in all the races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Ventura won with about 35% of the vote
and the best Pawlenty ever did was 45%.

The majority of Minnesotans did not want either one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. I went with Dayton.
I'll never forget watching him alone with Byrd in the *empty* Senate chamber prior to the IWR. He'll have my never ending respect for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC