Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First attempt to boost BP liability gets shut down in Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:35 PM
Original message
First attempt to boost BP liability gets shut down in Senate
Republicans thwarted Senate Democrats' first attempt to force a speedy vote on a plan to raise the liability cap on what BP and other oil companies have to pay in economic damages for offshore spills, like the one now spreading across the Gulf of Mexico.

The bid, by Sens. Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, as well as Bill Nelson of Florida, was shut down when Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, this afternoon objected to their request for a voice vote on the proposal. The measure would dramatically raise the liability cap on economic damages -- such as lost profits and tax revenue -- that any "responsible party" in an oil spill can be required to pay affected residents, businesses and communities.

Under a 20-year-old law, enacted after the Exxon Valdez tanker ran aground near Alaska, the cap is $75 million for spills from offshore platforms and rigs. But the Menendez bill would retroactively raise that limit to $10 billion.

The White House also has asked Congress to raise the cap, but administration officials have not said precisely what number they have in mind.

http://blogs.chron.com/newswatchenergy/archives/2010/05/push_to_boost_b.html



Her vote is interesting based on this contribution data:

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=n00026050

:grr:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
1.  HillBilly Reort.org



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oil Spill Worsens as Facts Add Insult to Injury

Posted: 14 May 2010 08:40 AM PDT

The mess in the Gulf of Mexico is still getting worse. With an estimated 210,000 gallons of oil pouring into the Gulf daily it seems as if things could not get worse for the people of that area and the distinct ecosystems. However, now it appears as if things have gotten worse. Oceanographers and independent analysts now believe that much more oil than that may be leaking daily after seeing the well for themselves. Adding insult to injury, reports are also surfacing about how the Mineral Management Agency seemed to just be a front group to allow the oil companies to circumvent federal law.
In the here and now it appears as if although over 200,000 gallons a day is not bad enough, there may actually be much more oil than that polluting the Gulf daily:

President Obama is scheduled to meet with cabinet members and other advisers on Friday concerning the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, with questions now circulating over just how much oil is gushing from the stricken undersea well.
Justin Gillis reports in The Times that the government estimate of the leak rate - 5,000 barrels or 210,000 gallons a day - is being doubted now that independent analysts can see the leak for themselves in video images that have been released. According to Mr. Gillis, at least one oceanographer believes the oil could be escaping at four or five times that rate, or more.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes...

As if this were not bad enough for the people who live and make their livings on the Gulf coast, now insult is being added to injury. You see, the Mineral Management Agency responsible for regulating offshore drilling seems to have just been a front group to help the oil industry evade the laws that could have helped prevent this disaster:


The federal Minerals Management Service gave permission to BP and dozens of other oil companies to drill in the Gulf of Mexico without first getting required permits from another agency that assesses threats to endangered species - and despite strong warnings from that agency about the impact the drilling was likely to have on the gulf.
The Minerals Management Service, or M.M.S., also routinely overruled its staff biologists and engineers who raised concerns about the safety and the environmental impact of certain drilling proposals in the gulf and in Alaska, according to a half-dozen current and former agency scientists.

"M.M.S. has given up any pretense of regulating the offshore oil industry," said Kier?n Suckling, director of the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental advocacy group in Tucson, which filed notice of intent to sue the agency over its noncompliance with federal law concerning endangered species. "The agency seems to think its mission is to help the oil industry evade environmental laws."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05...

How disgraceful is that?? Should someone not be held accountable for this criminal lapse in judgement?? Are any of the folks who issued permission without the required permits still employed at M.M.S.?? If so it seems to me they should be immediately dismissed. This mixing of Corporations and the agencies that "regulate" them must be stopped and made into what it is, criminal activity.

In other spill news, Democrats are trying to raise the liability limit on oil companies from $75 million to $10 billion as the true costs of this disaster are becoming known. But of course, it has been blocked by a Republican Senator who obviously just wants to "Drill Baby Drill", no matter the cost:


The liability measure was pushed by Senators Frank R. Lautenberg and Robert Menendez, Democrats of New Jersey, and Bill Nelson, Democrat of Florida, who said the current limit represents a small fraction of the likely damage from the BP spill in the gulf.
Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, a strong proponent of offshore drilling, blocked their bill, saying it would discourage all oil exploration. Ms. Murkowski is sponsoring a separate bill to raise oil taxes by a penny a barrel to increase the federal spill response fund.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05...

I guess next we will see Ms. Murkowski shooting wolves from a helicopter with fellow Alaskan Sarah Palin. That is about how much these folks care about endangered species and precious ecosystems. I think it speaks volumes for the modern Republican Party when after a disaster like this all they can do is STILL defend the oil companies.

We owe it to the people and ecosystems of the Gulf to get to the bottom of this huge, corrupt failure. We need to insure that regulations on activities such as this are not written by the Corporation for the oil industry. Whomever issued the permission for BP to drill in the Gulf should be just as accountable for this mess as BP themselves.

Hopefully this will teach Americans a valuable lesson. Sometimes the government is not the enemy and sometimes regulations are good and much needed. I do not believe we need to tell that to anyone who made their living in the Gulf and now see that destroyed. How many hard lessons will it take before we realize the quest for Corporate profit at all costs is slashing the throats of the rest of us??

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. $75 million cap - what a joke
And where are the Gulf Coast Senators who should be protecting their states and local economies? Well they're too busy protecting the oil companies who grease their back pockets. $75 million doesn't even cover one city much less the whole Gulf Coast area.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska you are scum - oil scum.

A pox on the whole lot of them. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Senator Lisa Murkowski R-AK,
Senator Lisa Murkowski R-AK, who is up for re-election, Decided to vote for the rights of a foreign corporation over the rights of American citizens. Please take the time to call, email and copy this and send to all of your friends. This woman has sold out her country.

ALASKA
Fairbanks: 907-456-0233

Wasilla: 907-376-7665 Fax: 907-376-8526

Anchorage: 907-271-3735 Fax: 907-276-4081
TOLL FREE 1-877-829-6030
FAX 1-877-857-0322

Kenai: 907-283-5808 Fax 907-283-4363

Ketchikan: 907-225-6880 Fax 907-225-0390

Email Page: http://mur kowski.sen ate.gov/pu blic/index .cfm?p=EMa ilLisa

WASHINGTON
Phone: 202-224-6665
Fax: 202-224-5301

Send many faxes to her hard copy she and her staff can not ignore, e-mail and fill her box, call leave messages...

Remind Senator Murkowski that she works for us now and we need her to do what's best for us. If we are not paying her enough that she should immediately resign and go work for the oil industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onestepforward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. $10 million is a drop in the hat. It should be set at $236 billion...
the total assets of BP. :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. There's no doubt as to whose "kept woman" Murkowski si
Edited on Sat May-15-10 05:49 AM by hobbit709
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Watch the Video
Edited on Sat May-15-10 05:05 PM by white cloud
A bill to increase the liability cap for oil spills from $75 million to $10 billion was defeated Thursday by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.

Bill S.3305, the "Big Oil Bailout Prevention Liability Act" would cap BP's liability at $10 billion, even if damages from the gulf oil spill surpass that figure. The company already estimates that spill will cost $450 million to clean up.

Murkowski, a drilling supporter, has received almost $300,000 in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry. While Murkowski said that she supports raising the cap, she argued that the $10 billion figure would prohibit all but the biggest of oil companies from drilling oil offshore:

It would be impossible or perhaps close to impossible for any energy company that is smaller than the supermajors, smaller than the national oil companies, to operate in the O.C.S.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/13/lisa-murkowski-blocks-bil_n_575918.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyu2d2cu1mw&feature=player_embedded


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Love how they say " Be Responsible" ( not me)
Source: Anchorage Daily News

Jim Clark, former chief of staff to ex-Gov. Frank Murkowski, agreed to plead guilty Monday to a single felony charge of fraud in the latest case brought by the federal government in the Alaska corruption scandal.

Clark admitted asking officials of the now-defunct oil-field service company Veco to illegally spend more than $68,000 on polls and political consultants for Murkowski's failed re-election bid in 2006. The expenditures were never disclosed, the government charged.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3208542
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Dems: We'll dare GOP to side with Big Oil

This could get interesting: Senate Democratic leaders plan to repeatedly push legislation next week to lift the liability cap on oil companies, in an effort to dare Republicans to side with Big Oil and oppose lifting the burden on taxpayers to clean up disasters like the Gulf oil spill, aides tell me.

With the politics of oil seemingly as slippery as ever, Dems already tried to pass such legislation by unanimous consent yesterday, only to have it blocked by GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. The bill would have hiked the ceiling of liability for oil companies from $75 million to $10 billion after an oil spill.

Dem Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey tried a voice vote request on the bill yesterday, but Murkowski opposed it on the grounds that it could hurt what some are derisively calling "Small Oil" -- small companies that could get priced out of the market.

Senate Dem leaders reacted angrily yesterday to Murkowski's block. And now they say they're going to push the issue next week, by calling for more votes on it. Harry Reid spokesman Jim Manley emails:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/05/dems_well_force_republicans_to.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. So the daughter takes after her father
A new Cheney style of family political corruption.

Just as dad's going down in his career, the daughter steps up to "save" the family legacy. But in each case the daughters are as bad as their fathers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Mom and Pop oil operations? WTF?
What Mom and Pop Oil operations are drilling off shore now? She has to be lying. If anyone is out there now, they're working for the super oil companies anyway. And like Menendez said do you really want small independents who could not afford to be liable for this kind of spill? It would make it much, much worse.

You're simply going to have the supers set up all these levels of "independents" who can't be expected to pay anything, since they don't have any assets.

Hell of a loophole Murky! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Meet Transocean
Edited on Sat May-15-10 06:34 PM by white cloud
Aside from the fact that it is the world's biggest offshore drilling contractor and was the operator of the Deepwater Horizon rig that exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico, here are three things worth knowing about Transocean:

1.In 1999, Transocean moved overseas, leaving its headquarters in Delaware to incorporate in Switzerland (which is bordered on all sides by land) to dodge U.S. taxes. As a result of its move, the company reduced its tax burden by 50%.
2.Just yesterday, Transocean cited an 1851 law in a court filing requesting that its liability be limited to $27 million. Transocean claims the law in question limits the total liability of maritime operators to the cost of the vessel that sunk. It has already collected hundreds of millions in insurance.
3.Deepwater Horizon was one of 35 Transocean rigs sailing under the flag of the Marshall

Sounds like Haliburton-- formula off shore the profits

from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/14/866460/-Meet-BPs-partner,-Transocean?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Invoking maritime law to try to limit the damages
NPR 5/14/10
Transocean Seeks Limited Liability In Suits
(snip)
The company that owns the oil rig that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico has asked a federal court to put a limit on the money it might be forced to pay out in more than 100 lawsuits. The company seeks to cap damages at $27 million. But Transocean already has been paid more than $400 million by its own insurance company for the loss of the rig.


Fuckers want to make a profit on the loss. :mad:

Yes just as bad as Haliburton. Who is also responsible in this mess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC