|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Still a Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:24 PM Original message |
69 percent of liberal Democrats support tax package |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. This all sounds so familiar............. ..................oh yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bbgrunt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. it is a necessary part of kabuki. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Democrats at the top will not change this pattern because it unlocks the coffers of corporate money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. "A framework for legislation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Framework does not at all necessarily mean that its parts can be voted upon individually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. So if it's framework, we can toss pieces that don't fit, or adjust pieces that fit badly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. 20% strong support, 49% somewhat support = misleading headline. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
10. BULL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-13-10 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
11. "A slender 11 percent of those polled back all four of the deal's primary tax provisions..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 04:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC