HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Emrys » Journal
Page: 1


Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Current location: Scotland
Member since: Mon Sep 7, 2009, 12:57 AM
Number of posts: 5,973

Journal Archives

'Northern Powerhouse' department to close Sheffield office and move 247 jobs to London

The Government's 'Northern Powerhouse' department is to shut down its office in Sheffield, moving 247 jobs to London in a blow to the credibility of George Osborne's pet project.

And a dozen more regional offices of the Department for Business Innovation and Skills - including six in the North of England - are at risk of closure as the department moves to centralise policy staff.


The Prime Minister's spokesman said: "The Business Department, like all departments, seeks to operate as efficiently as it possibly can to deliver the best quality of service to provide the right kind of guidance and advice to ministers.

"This is part of their process of becoming leaner and more efficient."

The restructuring will see the department move to a centralised headquarters in London, with six regional business centres set up around the country.


You really couldn't make it up. Well, I doubt I could.

Why the remaining refuge occupiers think SEALs are going to come to rescue them

From Forbes writer J.J. MacNab's Twitter feed:

JJ MacNab

About those Navy Seals.. Now that I have a few minutes to explain why the militants thinks Seals are on the way..

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 40m40 minutes ago

Around midnight last night, new arrival/militant Todd Bethell was manning the entrance to the Refuge.

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 38m38 minutes ago

A large number of militants had decided to take up the FBI's kind offer to run away.

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 37m37 minutes ago

However, the group had blocked the road out with a truck and no one could find the keys to move it out of the way. Hilarity ensued.

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 33m33 minutes ago

A guy named Dillon wandered into the Refuge."I've been coming around" was enough to get him though this highly protected perimeter.

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 28m28 minutes ago

Keys were found. Truck was moved. Blaine Cooper & 2 others left for Idaho at that point, while militants that performed a "perimeter check"

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 27m27 minutes ago

Bethell expressed concern about letting everyone in because he was new, and didn't know who anyone was.

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 30m30 minutes ago

A Vietnam vet guy with long hair, beard, big voice, and bigger ego arrived with a truck filled with guns and powder. <-- Navy Seal

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 28m28 minutes ago

When asked how he got through the FBI road closure, he he scoffed and reminded Bethell that he was a Navy Seal. Bethell expressed doubt.

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 27m27 minutes ago

Doubt was no barrier to this heavily guarded fortress so the Navy Seal and his truck moved into the Refuge.

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 21m21 minutes ago

The Navy Seal promised to return to save the day with 13 fellow Seals (a pod? a herd?)

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 19m19 minutes ago

The Navy Seal's truck, it turned out, carried wood, not guns/powder but the militants remain steadfast in their belief that help is imminent

JJ MacNab ‏@jjmacnab 17m17 minutes ago

I didn't didn't live tweet this last night in case if was an FBI ruse. Feds love ruses.

The end.

Revealed: Secret Labour report published in full

A secret report commissioned by Labour to explain its general election defeat has laid bare the fundamental problems the party has faced.

Obtained by ITV News' Political Editor Robert Peston, the report says "Labour negatives are deep and powerful".

The report is called "Emerging from the Darkness" and is published here in full.


Once beyond the concept of a "secret" report being published in full (which raises a few questions, not least who leaked/stole it, and to what ends), this report published by ITV news may be interesting for what it reveals about the reasons behind Labour's 2015 defeat, about the shortcomings of focus group-based research (with question marks over controls for group dynamics, how and which issues are raised etc.), or neither, or both.

Given those caveats, one thing that emerges is that the research - and presumably in turn UK Labour - has ceded the ground that Labour's last period in government can be characterized as spendthrift, and that the Tories' stewardship of the economy in recent times has been competent. Both of those propositions are far from proven, but this is presumably the predominant mindset in these focus groups given their exposure to the media and what "sounds right" hence must be so.

I won't comment on the rest, at least for now. I have some views about the findings for Scotland, but they're anecdotal from (not particularly broad) personal experience, and not particularly important.

I will say that Labour's obsession with focus groups for policy formulation has done a great job of strengthening the party's position over the course of the last couple of decades. You can decide for yourselves whether I'm being sarcastic.

Yeah. British scandalsheets take the biscuit for hypocrisy.

But you can skip around all that if you try real hard.

Or there's the oh-so-well-illustrated spreads of whichever celebs of the day just happen to be pictured sunning themselves on a beach accompanied by cut-and-paste yada yada detailed commentary on their sex lives, curves, or lack of them, drooling over the skimpiness or voluminousness of their swimsuit, or the fact they've put on weight and let themselves go, how dare they, how could they not ...? But the pictures!

Or the latest scaremongering rightwing crap about asylum seekers, with just a smidgeon of fact mixed in, like all the best propagandists, or hatchet jobs on whatever the latest societal outgroup the Mail decides to pick on and incite its rabid commenters to pillory may be. Never a dull moment. But the pictures!

Or just about anything political that most of this forum rails vociferously, bitterly, and often at extreme length against on any given day. But the pictures!

But nice pics. Yeah, they've got that nailed. Let's link to them daily, mention them in passing so others link to them, reward them for their stances and send them ad revenue from a political board that used to think itself "underground," as long as they feed us just enough red meat by pandering to our prejudices, and we can look down our noses and call them a "rag" in an effort to inoculate ourselves while expressing approval, as if we're any better than those rabid commenters when it comes down to it. And then there's the pictures. We'll always have the pictures.

Revealed: how Jeremy Corbyn has reshaped the Labour party

Jeremy Corbyn’s hopes of remoulding Labour have been boosted by a detailed Guardian survey into the party at grassroots level that shows overwhelming support for him, a decisive shift to the left and unhappiness with squabbling among MPs.

The Guardian has interviewed Labour secretaries, chairs, other office holders and members from more than 100 of the 632 constituencies in England, Scotland and Wales. Almost every constituency party across the country we contacted reported doubling, trebling, quadrupling or even quintupling membership, and a revival of branches that had been moribund for years and close to folding.

Party membership figures are a controversial issue, with the former cabinet minister Peter Mandelson, who is opposed to Corbyn, telling a Labour meeting in the Lords last month that “30,000 long-term members have left the party, real members, tens of thousands”.

But the newly released figures undermine his claim, showing a total of 13,860 have left since the general election, some of them having resigned while others have gone as part of natural churn. The increase in membership is continuing, with just under 1,000 having joined since Christmas Eve.

The survey found:

* The rise in membership has been uneven across the country. In contrast with steep rises in London and elsewhere in England and Wales, the rises in Scotland have been relatively modest, ominous for the party’s hopes in May’s Scottish parliamentary election.
* Members, in spite of unhappiness with public splits within the PLP, say there is no appetite for deselection of MPs. But some acknowledge that proposed boundary changes in 2018 could result in de-facto deselection.
* Returning members, who had left Labour mainly in protest over the 2003 Iraq invasion, are making an immediate impact, partly because they are familiar with the rules.
* Both returning members and new ones tend to be mainly leftwing. There are few reports of attempted infiltration from hard-left groups.


I don't have a direct axe to grind here. I'm in Scotland, and the survey's findings about "modest" membership rises there chime with my views - Labour, at least with its current useless leadership personnel in Scotland, is a spent force up here.

The challenge will be to convert a re-energized membership into activism and meaningful electoral votes. I'd be interested to hear how well any of the rest of this survey and its observations fit with your local experiences. My gut feel tells me that the continual ant-Corbynite backbiting and mixed messaging are likely to be much more of a turnoff than any policies proposed or perceived gaffes.

Renew Trident? It’d make more sense to put Dad’s Army on the case


I am mystified. How did Hilary Benn, Maria Eagle, Charles Falconer and Paul Kenny, among others, come to choose the Trident nuclear missile as the totem of revolt against the Corbynites? Amid all the rubbish the Labour left espoused, defence has stood out as a beacon of sanity.


When the late defence chief Michael Carver famously asked of Trident, “What the bloody hell is it for?”, an informed guess was that roughly half his senior colleagues agreed, including most army generals. Former defence secretaries Des Browne (Labour) and Michael Portillo (Conservative) have come out against Trident. So have military experts from Hugh Beach to Patrick Cordingley. So has the formerly pro-nuclear defence pundit Michael Howard.


Historians such as Richard Rhodes and Andrew Alexander have catalogued the Nato mendacity and fear-mongering that was the cold war arms race with Russia. Rhodes’s Arsenals of Folly showed such recklessness raised rather than lowered the risk of nuclear miscalculation. The blatant use of fear by Cameron and others today is no less disingenuous. Any thinking person must know that the only defence against any sensible risk to British security today is a well-equipped ground force. Implausible and unusable weapons are pure waste.

When, back in 2007, Tony Blair was first pondering the renewal of Trident, he wrote in his memoir that he found the case dubious – and Gordon Brown agreed. Switching the money to something else “would not have been stupid”. But he then tried to imagine getting up in parliament to say he was giving up the British bomb, and merely thought, “We’re not going to say it, are we?” In other words, why bother with the right thing, when you can go on buying toys with other people’s money?

Given the history of nuclear scepticism within Labour, where Trident was long seen as a virility symbol of soundness on defence, it is bizarre of Corbyn’s foes to use this, of all policies, as a stick with which to beat him. For once he is right. Support him.

Full article in all its incendiary glory: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/13/renew-trident-dads-army-jeremy-corbyn-labour?CMP=share_btn_tw


I was approaching 14 when this single hit the charts. In backwoods Wales, you took your life in your hands if you publicly aped the fashions on display here.

The music from Bowie in this period was alien - wonderfully so - and the glam androgyny as shocking in its own way as punk would be a few years later. Add Mick Ronson to the mix - an inspiration to any budding guitar player, as I was - and the sci-fi overtones, and it was irresistable.

RIP, David.
Go to Page: 1