Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
erronis
erronis's Journal
erronis's Journal
September 28, 2020
Fascinating hypothesis.
...
The Times Drops the Big One and a Modest Proposal for a Deal with Donny: Wry Wing Politics
https://www.wrywingpolitics.com/the-times-drops-the-big-one-and-a-modest-proposal-for-a-deal-with-donny/Fascinating hypothesis.
While this latest Times piece confirms virtually everything any clear-headed adult suspected of a carnival act like Trump for the past 30 years, it will likely mean nothing to MAGA nation, assuming they even hear a word about it in their thickly-insulated echo chamber. But the moderator of next Tuesdays first debate, Chris Wallace of FoxNews, will commit journalistic malpractice if he doesnt push Trump on what is in the Times story.
...
...all the noise Trump (and Bill Barr) have been making about the rigged election and getting rid of the ballots and the continuation is a tactical device to build leverage for a deal with Biden once Trump is defeated. (Ive written about this before, because I think it is palpable likelihood. Like a layer of flop sweat forming under a bad con mans comb over.)
As todays Times story lays out, Trump is in (ridiculously) deep debt, with huge bills coming due in the next couple years, for which he is personally on the hook. And the tab gets bigger if he loses his much-referenced tax audit (over $100 million including penalties), and bigger still if New York and god knows how many stiffed contractors, harassed women, former employees go after him hard post the immunity of the White House.
Trump desperately and I do mean desperately needs a way out of this looming apocalypse. One way is if he wins the election. But barring that he needs something like blanket immunity from the state of New York. And that would mean striking a deal.
As Ive said before, only a hopeless idiot would enter into any deal with Trump that didnt have airtight conditions and abusive-level penalties.
So this is my proposal:
Trump agrees to concede the election. In return, the Biden administration, in union with Andrew Cuomo and Vance in New York set the following conditions for Trump and his family, (since Ivanka and the boys appear to have fat chunks of fraud splatter in their laps as well) to avoid prosecution.
The deal requires Trump to submit to a public interrogation by tax and white collar fraud attorney/prosecutors into any and all of his business dealings, from the time he took over from his father through to today. This would include everything involving the Russians, the Saudis, the Qataris, the Turks, and any other thug-ocracy hes been trolling for loose change.
It also stipulates the deal is voided the second Trump lies, misstates or mischaracterizes any pertinent fact.
Why public?
Because the story of Trump and the foundational lies of Trumpism has to be told. It has to be admitted to and confessed by Trump himself. History has to be written by the winners from the mouth of the loser.
Gellmans post-election hellscape is based on the premise that we will never know. That the fog and stench of Trumpism and Federalist Society Bill Barr-ism is desaigned to prevent anything from ever being truly knowable. (Such is Putins game in Russia.)
I believe Adam Schiff for one will eloquently argue that accepting anything less than a full peeling of the Trump myth simply enables a smarter, less louche and preposterous Trump from picking up the pieces and starting all over again. Even the most oblivious and deficient Trumper has to be presented with stark evidence that theyve been conned again.
Thirty nine percent will ignore the Times tax blockbuster and/or dismiss it as fake news, and Biden still needs a solid victory in Florida election night and a landslide overall to neuter any plausible claim Trump and Barr might present.
But the basis is now visibly forming to squeeze Trump into a corner from which his only escape is a Walk of Shame, to reference the entirely apt Game of Thrones.
As todays Times story lays out, Trump is in (ridiculously) deep debt, with huge bills coming due in the next couple years, for which he is personally on the hook. And the tab gets bigger if he loses his much-referenced tax audit (over $100 million including penalties), and bigger still if New York and god knows how many stiffed contractors, harassed women, former employees go after him hard post the immunity of the White House.
Trump desperately and I do mean desperately needs a way out of this looming apocalypse. One way is if he wins the election. But barring that he needs something like blanket immunity from the state of New York. And that would mean striking a deal.
As Ive said before, only a hopeless idiot would enter into any deal with Trump that didnt have airtight conditions and abusive-level penalties.
So this is my proposal:
Trump agrees to concede the election. In return, the Biden administration, in union with Andrew Cuomo and Vance in New York set the following conditions for Trump and his family, (since Ivanka and the boys appear to have fat chunks of fraud splatter in their laps as well) to avoid prosecution.
The deal requires Trump to submit to a public interrogation by tax and white collar fraud attorney/prosecutors into any and all of his business dealings, from the time he took over from his father through to today. This would include everything involving the Russians, the Saudis, the Qataris, the Turks, and any other thug-ocracy hes been trolling for loose change.
It also stipulates the deal is voided the second Trump lies, misstates or mischaracterizes any pertinent fact.
Why public?
Because the story of Trump and the foundational lies of Trumpism has to be told. It has to be admitted to and confessed by Trump himself. History has to be written by the winners from the mouth of the loser.
Gellmans post-election hellscape is based on the premise that we will never know. That the fog and stench of Trumpism and Federalist Society Bill Barr-ism is desaigned to prevent anything from ever being truly knowable. (Such is Putins game in Russia.)
I believe Adam Schiff for one will eloquently argue that accepting anything less than a full peeling of the Trump myth simply enables a smarter, less louche and preposterous Trump from picking up the pieces and starting all over again. Even the most oblivious and deficient Trumper has to be presented with stark evidence that theyve been conned again.
Thirty nine percent will ignore the Times tax blockbuster and/or dismiss it as fake news, and Biden still needs a solid victory in Florida election night and a landslide overall to neuter any plausible claim Trump and Barr might present.
But the basis is now visibly forming to squeeze Trump into a corner from which his only escape is a Walk of Shame, to reference the entirely apt Game of Thrones.
September 25, 2020
Repeat After Me, "It Will Never Be 'Normal' Again." : Wry Wing Politics
Good article (IMHO)
https://www.wrywingpolitics.com/repeat-after-me-it-will-never-be-normal-again/
Forget raining, its pouring Trump scandal books. The past few days Ive been toggling between Jeffrey Toobins, True Crimes and Misdemeanors and Brian Stelters, Hoax: Donald Trump, Fox News, and the Dangerous Distortion of Truth.
There are separate discussions to be had about both, as there are over Bob Woodwards Rage, the New York Times Michael Schmidts, Donald Trump v. The United States and top Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmans Where the Law Ends.
But one stark takeaway from Toobin and Stelter is how completely unprepared the establishment was for Donald Trump. More to the point both are argue, is how unprepared traditional legal bureaucracies and journalism organizations still are even today, nearly four years and 20,000 lies after Trump was elected the first time.
There are separate discussions to be had about both, as there are over Bob Woodwards Rage, the New York Times Michael Schmidts, Donald Trump v. The United States and top Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmans Where the Law Ends.
But one stark takeaway from Toobin and Stelter is how completely unprepared the establishment was for Donald Trump. More to the point both are argue, is how unprepared traditional legal bureaucracies and journalism organizations still are even today, nearly four years and 20,000 lies after Trump was elected the first time.
The Eisenhower-era of journalism, courts and politics is long gone. And were at a point, right now today where tradition-groomed and bound judges, politicians and journalists are have to ask themselves if theyre really going to play this moment as Robert Mueller did? Are they going to continue to respect the norms of their professions, all of which have been mocked, abused and degraded by Donald Trump, in the anachronistic hope that eventually, at some point, if not now, November or a decade from now, normal respect for tradition will prevail again?
September 7, 2020
A good read with some interesting ideas.
And Who Would Be The Donald's Real "Losers" and "Suckers"? - Brian Lambert
https://www.wrywingpolitics.com/and-who-would-be-the-donalds-real-losers-and-suckers/A good read with some interesting ideas.
Even before we got to the losers and suckers phase of The Donald Trump Experience we already knew this election was set in cement. Nothing is going to stop 39% of the American voting age population from idolizing a narcissistic reality TV performer. That 39% can almost be described as genetic, certainly figuratively and quite possibly literally.
To be specific, about the likelihood that the 39% is an evolutionary standard, possibly millions of years old. There have been studies of the psychological manifestations of an overactive, which is say, differently wired amygdala, the brains physical center for controlling emotions. A bit more active than normal and the fight-or flight mechanism is more hair-trigger and less reflective.
As scientists have said, ruefully in many cases, its an open question whether in evolutionary terms this 39% represents the portion of the species that survives what comes next and therefore passes on its DNA, or whether it fades away, an unadaptive anachronism, like wooly mammoths, dodo birds and our prehensile tails.
The immediate problem of course is what damage this highly instinctive, highly reactive, all but completely unreflective allegiance to the biggest apes constant false alarms does to the tribe in general.
The immediate problem of course is what damage this highly instinctive, highly reactive, all but completely unreflective allegiance to the biggest apes constant false alarms does to the tribe in general.
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: Green Mountains
Home country: US
Member since: Tue Feb 5, 2013, 04:27 PM
Number of posts: 15,241