Your persistent I'll give you that (Reply #32)

In the discussion thread: Al Franken should be out of the Senate: Why does DU defend him? [View all]

Wed Dec 20, 2017, 11:46 PM

32. Your persistent I'll give you that

I had a lengthily response to your second posting of this. When I went to hit send Poof! that thread was gone. I don't feel like retyping all that again so I'll keep it brief. I think what happened to Al Franken was shitty. I think far too many Democrats kneecapped him before all the facts were in. It's perfectly okay for you to disagree with that and express that view in this forum.

I'm a newbie when it comes to posting on this board and I'm still learning the ropes. Even without consulting the TOS I'm pretty certain that you spamming the board over and over again with the same post violates the rules. I won't alert on you but I suspect others here won't be so kind.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

91 replies	Author	Time	Post
Al Franken should be out of the Senate: Why does DU defend him? [View all]	Casprings	Dec 2017	OP
Can you name all six?	sfwriter	Dec 2017	#1
Some didn't want their names used..	Casprings	Dec 2017	#7
Yes, we should not believe them at all. The entertainer story is really suspect.	Shrike47	Dec 2017	#34
Then there is this...	sfwriter	Dec 2017	#50
There is always reason to doubt anonymous claims.	PoindexterOglethorpe	Dec 2017	#55
Uh...when an ACCUSER posts a pic like this and cries GROPER!!...I say BULLSHIT	Bengus81	Dec 2017	#89
Deja vu	Freethinker65	Dec 2017	#2
are you a one-trick pony???	Skittles	Dec 2017	#3
Third time you've posted this	Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin	Dec 2017	#4
I gather the other two times were hidden? It infuriates me that DUers allow this kind of thing	hlthe2b	Dec 2017	#80
Reminds me of this:	marble falls	Dec 2017	#5
The biggest threat to dems is not standing up for women because its our guy	Casprings	Dec 2017	#8
Quite the little contrarian, aren't we?	Stinky The Clown	Dec 2017	#6
Why do you keep posting this garbage? eom	Control-Z	Dec 2017	#9
Because I am looking for a rationale defense of him and I want to have that discussion in the bounds	Casprings	Dec 2017	#11
He wanted an ethics investigation and was railroaded before he got it. That was wrong.	shraby	Dec 2017	#17
He lost support of his own caucus when the SIXTH woman came out..	Casprings	Dec 2017	#19
I Don't Believe That's What You're Looking For At All...	JimGinPA	Dec 2017	#54
BTW, what's this "we" stuff?	Stinky The Clown	Dec 2017	#10
he and his comrades	Skittles	Dec 2017	#28
maybe the ethics committee should just close up shop	orleans	Dec 2017	#12
Being in the Senate is a privilege	Casprings	Dec 2017	#16
oh god! "forcible touches people"...give me a fucking break	orleans	Dec 2017	#24
What do you call this?	Casprings	Dec 2017	#31
I THINK HE DIDN'T FUCKING KISS HER	orleans	Dec 2017	#47
We have not heard six stories from six women. 2nd hand hearsay is worthless.	Shrike47	Dec 2017	#49
Being in the Senate is not a privilege.	Buzz cook	Dec 2017	#62
I thought you did this tread already?	PragmaticDem	Dec 2017	#13
Senators are pretty fungible - I always just do a hot swap	dalton99a	Dec 2017	#14
So you think these six events did not occur or do you think that even if they did, it is okay?	Casprings	Dec 2017	#15
We'll never know now, will we?	shraby	Dec 2017	#18
No, I am fully willing to believe the women	Casprings	Dec 2017	#21
Instead of keeping the Senate seat until 2020	wellst0nev0ter	Dec 2017	#58
Which do you prefer:	Gabi Hayes	Dec 2017	#23
Why are you not accusing this man?	sheshe2	Dec 2017	#39
Как погода в Ст Петерсбург теперь	Botany	Dec 2017	#20
Yes, because a person that believe that a Senator who touches women shouldn't be in the Senate..	Casprings	Dec 2017	#25
ваша английская язык очень плох	Botany	Dec 2017	#30
Such a pretty picture for so much ugliness. Nt	lostnfound	Dec 2017	#59
+1	uponit7771	Dec 2017	#61
But someone who keeps on touching women shouldn't be in the US Senate.	Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin	Dec 2017	#22
Unwanted or without consent touching nt	Casprings	Dec 2017	#26
Because most of us believe the accusations to be bullshit	Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin	Dec 2017	#40
One name.	sheshe2	Dec 2017	#43
...	orleans	Dec 2017	#27
Your not look for a rationale defense of Franken	standingtall	Dec 2017	#29
Post removed	Post removed	Dec 2017	#33
No one said anyone deserved anything	standingtall	Dec 2017	#41
And the Congressional Staffer who said:	Casprings	Dec 2017	#45
Would not matter to me if there were a million accusers	standingtall	Dec 2017	#53
Prove to me...	quickesst	Dec 2017	#65
Your persistent I'll give you that	MustLoveBeagles	Dec 2017	#32
3rd time posting? Might you be a "flamethrower"?	RealityChik	Dec 2017	#35
Informed logic?	Casprings	Dec 2017	#38
Really? Really? I can't say what I really want to say.	Ferrets are Cool	Dec 2017	#36
This bullshit has already been removed...	GReedDiamond	Dec 2017	#37
Because I mentioned a pervious jury ruling in the post..	Casprings	Dec 2017	#42
uh huh...	GReedDiamond	Dec 2017	#46
Roger Stone, that's why. Comrade.	sarcasmo	Dec 2017	#44
It was a hit job cooked up by the right wing media and egged on by a few Democrats	doc03	Dec 2017	#48
HOW COME it all went silent suddenly no nothing?	Historic NY	Dec 2017	#51
Why are we even discussing Franken? His decision is made	Blue_Tires	Dec 2017	#52
Because We're Ambitious And Want A Two-Fer	Vogon_Glory	Dec 2017	#83
Post removed	Post removed	Dec 2017	#56
I've done stupid things at times, sexist in it's content now...years ago	Demonaut	Dec 2017	#57
I don't defend Franken I defend due process	Buzz cook	Dec 2017	#60
Hey Casprings- I don't agree with you; don't agree with you at all. Nor do I support you.	NBachers	Dec 2017	#63
Because it was a hit job. Plain and simple. n/t	LuckyCharms	Dec 2017	#64
Because many of us don't believe any of his accusers	Sen. Walter Sobchak	Dec 2017	#66
Again with this crap? Go away.	Hekate	Dec 2017	#67
Can any well-read person be this ignorant? Or...	Duppers	Dec 2017	#68
I don't believe them	MFM008	Dec 2017	#69
Post removed	Post removed	Dec 2017	#70
This is the best comment.	betsuni	Dec 2017	#72
I'm touched by your effort to do actions to independently make Al Franken look worser.	betsuni	Dec 2017	#71
I think you need a bigger spoon	tavernier	Dec 2017	#73
A canoe paddle will make it easier. How the pot rose from the grave is a puzzle. n/t	rzemanfl	Dec 2017	#85
Again?	Joe941	Dec 2017	#74
Even if every accusation were the "Gospel Truth"	GaryCnf	Dec 2017	#75
Ignore.	Itchinjim	Dec 2017	#76
The moral high ground isn't worth squat when they have their boot on your neck.	CrispyQ	Dec 2017	#77
No. He should not be out.	Tipperary	Dec 2017	#78
do you really think you're helping the cause with this?	Locrian	Dec 2017	#79
"Innocent until proven guilty"	left-of-center2012	Dec 2017	#81
Franken's Ouster And Suspicious Minds	Vogon_Glory	Dec 2017	#82
It would be best for everybody involved to move on than to continuously litigate it.	DemocratSinceBirth	Dec 2017	#84
Was rubbing her butt on a man done with permission?	Lint Head	Dec 2017	#86
Naughty, Naughty For Posting That Video Clip	Vogon_Glory	Dec 2017	#88
Republicans assume everyone will lump allegations	riverwalker	Dec 2017	#87
Drop the privilege bs. Senate is not a private club.	delisen	Dec 2017	#90
When is Trump resigning for his 19 or so sexual assaults?	workinclasszero	Dec 2017	#91

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.