Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Avenatti [View all]WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)22. I didn't request that you join me.
I’m not even sure what call to action I made. That is the exact problem with emotions overcoming logic. It interferes with our thought process. What it is is motivational. Politicians throughout history have plated to people’s emotions for their own personal gains. There is very little benefit from being angry for decades or longer. This is not new for the Republican Party. It’s the status quo for them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I totally agree. He is one of the few people on this planet that moves the unindicted co-conspirator
Squinch
Oct 2018
#1
I think he's just fine! I wish more of our Dems were in-yer-face combative like he is.
calimary
Oct 2018
#16
We need to remember it was Avenatti's and Clifford's (Stormy Daniel's) case
forgotmylogin
Oct 2018
#33
Whomever disses Avenatti, Sanders, or any ally we have are (suspicously) working against the party
LiberalLovinLug
Oct 2018
#42