Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,313 posts)
4. He's in it up to his turtle-neck.
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 07:27 AM
Nov 2018

Blavatnik emigrated here with his family in the 70's but still has ties to Russia.

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2018/05/08/putins-proxies-helped-funnel-millions-gop-campaigns

Data from the Federal Election Commission show that Blavatnik's campaign contributions dating back to 2009-10 were fairly balanced across party lines and relatively modest for a billionaire. During that season he contributed $53,400. His contributions increased to $135,552 in 2011-12 and to $273,600 in 2013-14, still bipartisan.

In 2015-16, everything changed. Blavatnik's political contributions soared and made a hard right turn as he pumped $6.35 million into GOP political action committees, with millions of dollars going to top Republican leaders including Sens. Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio and Lindsey Graham.

In 2017, donations continued, with $41,000 going to both Republican and Democrat candidates, along with $1 million to McConnell's Senate Leadership Fund.

SNIP

In total, Blavatnik, Intrater, Shustorovich and Kukes made $10.4 million in political contributions from the start of the 2015-16 election cycle through September 2017, and 99 percent of their contributions went to Republicans. With the exception of Shustorovich, the common denominator that connects the men is their association with Vekselberg. Experts who follow the activities of Russian oligarchs told ABC News that they believe the contributions from Blavatnik, Intrater and Kukes warrant intense scrutiny because they have worked closely with Vekselberg.

Even if the donations by the four men associated with Russia ultimately pass muster with Mueller, one still has to wonder: Why did GOP PACs and other Trump-controlled funds take their money? Why didn't the PACs say, "Thanks, but no thanks," like the Republicans said to Shustorovich in 2000? Yes, it was legal to accept their donations, but it was incredibly poor judgment.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It depends atreides1 Nov 2018 #1
Simply a traitor by deed and inaction BSdetect Nov 2018 #18
I see him as the architect of this shit show. SunSeeker Nov 2018 #2
McConnell is very complicit and proves constantly on a daily basis where his loyalities lay.... SWBTATTReg Nov 2018 #3
Exactly! ewagner Nov 2018 #14
He's in it up to his turtle-neck. pnwmom Nov 2018 #4
Conspiracy law has a wide net. There is hope empedocles Nov 2018 #6
I know where this thread is going, watoos Nov 2018 #5
You are so correct......... MyOwnPeace Nov 2018 #11
The thing is watoos Nov 2018 #16
Wish it could be that way......... MyOwnPeace Nov 2018 #19
Very nuxvomica Nov 2018 #7
He's in it up to his double chin. blueinredohio Nov 2018 #8
McTurdmouth Racerdog1 Nov 2018 #9
Apt description but zentrum Nov 2018 #10
Follow the money randr Nov 2018 #12
So is Paul Ryan True Blue American Nov 2018 #13
He's taking money from billionaires to damage the republic sharedvalues Nov 2018 #15
if there is any one I want to bdamomma Nov 2018 #17
Same here. JudyM Nov 2018 #20
Complicit? Hell, he's steering a lot of the deplorable boat! NT Adrahil Nov 2018 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How complicit is Mitch Mc...»Reply #4