Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is Barr SEEMINGLY choosing TREASON over PATRIOTISM? [View all]90-percent
(6,956 posts)20. My understanding of the STRICT DEFINITION of "treason" is wrong
So I looked up synonyms that I hope better match the meaning of my original intent. And picked out a few that could replace "treason" in my original post.
sedition
subversion
treachery
perfidy
traitorousness
seditiousness
Subsititute any of the above for "treason".
My point is: These guys take oaths. Destroying hundreds of years of American values so as to support a president hell bent on becoming a Dictator is a very despicable thing to do. Up there with helping terrorists nuke the US. And it's happening right in front of us in real time and our Institutions seem too hopeless and corrupt to turn this fascist police state tide!
-90% Jimmy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is something out in the media about Barr having worked for Russian interests
sarabelle
Apr 2019
#48
Barr said that Mueller said there was no conspiracy with Russian Government OFFICIALS.
lagomorph777
Apr 2019
#41
We have no idea what Mueller's criteria may or may not have been, nor his real conclusions.
lagomorph777
Apr 2019
#43
I'm confident that the courts will not consider Russia an enemy for purposes of the treason clause
onenote
Apr 2019
#35
No. This is about protecting the Republican Party. What he is doing is not TREASON. It is highly
OnDoutside
Apr 2019
#21
Because he got away with it for Iran Contra, so he figures he'll do it again. nt
Baltimike
Apr 2019
#30