General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We should have been colonizing the solar system by now. [View all]a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)1.) You're not a very good mind-reader. May I suggest that you don't give up your day job? (If you have one...)
2.) I thought you weren't responding to me anymore.
3.) You have posted anecdotes, without sources. You seem to think your anecdotes constitute.
4.) One of your statements read something like "without drugs, science would have been set back hundreds of years." As the proponent/acusser, the burden of proof is on YOU to prove the the only way those advances happened is via drugs.
5.) What is this thing you have for Nancy Reagan?
6.) When you want to post FACTS, instead of rhetoric, feel free.
7.) "inspiration" isn't design work. Nor is it construction.
8.) I hadn't heard the one about acid and ecstasy draining spinal fluid...
I HAVE heard of these
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1129381/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1502618/?page=1
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1923615/?page=1
9.) I know you'll likely say these are all nancy-inspired propaganda. Feel free. I expect no less from someone evangelizing drugs. NIH at lest cites their sources.
10.) Any time you want to have a contest with criteria to determine the better inventor/builder, let me know. It'll have to be a neutral location, as there is no way I'm letting a potential junkie into my house.