Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TruckFump

(5,812 posts)
18. IMO, I don't think that SCOTUS will get involved.
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 05:01 PM
Oct 2019

I used to do a lot of Fed appeals work. My law partner had been a Clerk on the 9th cir. before he was an AUSA in Calif Central District and all of this prior to private practice. But it has been years and all in Calif Central District to the 9th cir. I am used a liberal court, especially back when I was in active practice. IMO, too political for SCOTUS. That is just a gut reaction more than anything. Betting that they dodge this.

I don't think the Feddie courts will allow the Trumpets to sloooooooooow walk this. I also think, and it's ironic, that this is or could be a problem for the Barr crim investigation on how the Mueller investigation started. Once all the facts are out and Barr cannot spin it, it could be (I hope) the end of this kind of BS coming from Barr for the benefit of Trump that some crime was involved re the investigation of the 2016 election.

and they will appeal and delay still_one Oct 2019 #1
Could get an expedited appeal. TruckFump Oct 2019 #2
+1, it's good news and our expectations are set accordingly uponit7771 Oct 2019 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2019 #3
Yep, along with all the GJ testimony TruckFump Oct 2019 #5
Well, the Conservative Caucus wants openness and transparency. No more Closed Doors. Midnight Writer Oct 2019 #6
Yes, they certainly are going to just that ! TruckFump Oct 2019 #7
The unredacted report? maryellen99 Oct 2019 #8
I am betting so but would like confirmation. triron Oct 2019 #9
Yes. This is the ordering clause in the opinion: onenote Oct 2019 #13
From what I have read, it appears so. TruckFump Oct 2019 #10
It will be slow-walked to the Supreme Court. Patterson Oct 2019 #11
Not if the lower court orders an expedited appeal. TruckFump Oct 2019 #12
I don't think the District Court can tell the SCOTUS to expedite the case. onenote Oct 2019 #14
Does not go directly to the SCOTUS. Goes to D.C. Cir. Ct. TruckFump Oct 2019 #16
Several options are available onenote Oct 2019 #17
IMO, I don't think that SCOTUS will get involved. TruckFump Oct 2019 #18
Agree with you that the disclosure to the Committee of the redacted GJ material could put a damper onenote Oct 2019 #19
Seems to be interesting timing on this. TruckFump Oct 2019 #21
I assume that means that only House investigators will get to see it, not the general public renate Oct 2019 #15
IMO, for now. TruckFump Oct 2019 #22
Chairman @RepJerryNadler released the following statement Gothmog Oct 2019 #20
K&R smirkymonkey Oct 2019 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Holy shit!!!! All of Muel...»Reply #18