Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hack89

(39,171 posts)

1. The right to bear arm is independent of militia service

Reply to rampartc (Original post)

Thu Mar 25, 2021, 07:39 AM

Mar 2021

According to the Supreme Court, presidents Biden and Obama, Bernie and HRC. It was actually put into the Democratic Party platform. Your position is not even in line with mainstream Democratic thought much less the country as a whole.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"a well regulated militia ..." [View all] rampartc Mar 2021 OP

The right to bear arm is independent of militia service hack89 Mar 2021 #1

I actually agree with the OP Sanity Claws Mar 2021 #2

Nothing happened to it hack89 Mar 2021 #3

armed citizens were always on call , led by local officials, rampartc Mar 2021 #4

In the context of the 2A regulated means "well equipped and trained" hack89 Mar 2021 #7

Because in much of the history of the USA, we didn't have gun-humpers like this -- Hoyt Mar 2021 #5

Which has nothing to do with my post. hack89 Mar 2021 #8

the originalist interpretation make the argument that well regulated had a different meaning in 1776 Amishman Mar 2021 #6

They should have left out the comma. marie999 Mar 2021 #9