Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

20. Please, do tell

Reply to samsingh (Reply #18)

Mon Jun 14, 2021, 02:20 PM

Jun 2021

Where in Judge Jackson's order does she selectively use the law against Democrats and for Trump's and Putin's benefit?

Please be specific in cite the language you're relying on. Of course that means you'll have to actually read the opinion, but we can wait...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge grants DOJ's request to temporarily block release of Trump obstruction memo [View all] Fullduplexxx Jun 2021 OP

How long will Garland's Justice department keep comradebillyboy Jun 2021 #1

WTF is going on? If Garland won't do his job, he's got to go to the curb with lagomorph777 Jun 2021 #13

Why do you assume they're protecting Trump? StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #17

Judge Amy Berman Jackson is as solid and straight up as they come StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #2

I agree ..... nt Fullduplexxx Jun 2021 #4

There could be info in it that legitimately should be kept confidential for now, Ocelot II Jun 2021 #3

Agreed that's why I included that last paragraph ... nt Fullduplexxx Jun 2021 #5

Who cares!? We want to see it and we want to see it now!!! StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #11

Let the hissy fits begin! Ocelot II Jun 2021 #15

Because if you or I or the other folks on DU can just read the unredact report now StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #19

I fucking give up. Voltaire2 Jun 2021 #6

Because the reasons for and against also need to be of record Effete Snob Jun 2021 #7

she believes that it shouldn't be prematurely unredacted before the department has an opportunity to Fullduplexxx Jun 2021 #8

You mean the rule of law? Effete Snob Jun 2021 #9

Explain to us, Mr. Garland.... WHY WHY WHY? Goodheart Jun 2021 #10

Garland already explained it in great detail StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #12

keep doing trump and putin's work for them samsingh Jun 2021 #14

Oh, please. Ocelot II Jun 2021 #16

the law is selectively used against Democrats for Putin and trump's benefit samsingh Jun 2021 #18

Please, do tell StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #20

I'll help. Here's a link to Judge Jackson's order and memorandum Ocelot II Jun 2021 #21

I have FULL TRUST in this judge! bluestarone Jun 2021 #22