Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Report: DOJ Brings In More Firepower--and Takes Aim at Trumpworld [View all]reACTIONary
(6,977 posts)29. The committee is not turning transcripts over to DOJ...
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/06/21/jan-6-committee-justice-department-transcripts-00040986
Once the department comes into possession of this material, they will likely be obligated to produce at least portions of it to some of the 800-plus defendants who have been charged to date by prosecutors based on their involvement in the siege of the Capitol. Even with so-called protective orders in place that nominally prevent defendants from widely disseminating discovery from the government, there is no realistic way to ensure that defendants or their lawyers will not share this material with people who are not supposed to have access to it. That, in turn, might allow people to coordinate their stories, and it could disincentivize other people from coming forward to speak to the committee.
As for the Justice Departments position, it is understandable that they would want this material, but the suggestion that they are entitled to it is dubious at best. In order to satisfy their discovery obligations to criminal defendants, prosecutors are required to produce (among other things) any exculpatory evidence in their possession, but this is not evidence in the departments possession.
Once the department comes into possession of this material, they will likely be obligated to produce at least portions of it to some of the 800-plus defendants who have been charged to date by prosecutors based on their involvement in the siege of the Capitol. Even with so-called protective orders in place that nominally prevent defendants from widely disseminating discovery from the government, there is no realistic way to ensure that defendants or their lawyers will not share this material with people who are not supposed to have access to it. That, in turn, might allow people to coordinate their stories, and it could disincentivize other people from coming forward to speak to the committee.
As for the Justice Departments position, it is understandable that they would want this material, but the suggestion that they are entitled to it is dubious at best. In order to satisfy their discovery obligations to criminal defendants, prosecutors are required to produce (among other things) any exculpatory evidence in their possession, but this is not evidence in the departments possession
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Report: DOJ Brings In More Firepower--and Takes Aim at Trumpworld [View all]
babylonsister
Jul 2022
OP
Yes it is! Now I hope we get updates on continued expansion of the DOJ effort
liberalla
Jul 2022
#27
YES! Because the only way to adjudicate this octopus quickly is to have more working on it!
ancianita
Jul 2022
#16
1-person can more manpower. That means there are two working on the case. Woo-Hoo..
Hotler
Jul 2022
#34
What this tells me is the the DoJ has been reluctant to pursue Trump and his cronies...
Silent3
Jul 2022
#38
I thought that DoJ request for more funding to hire more was turned down by Congress.
Grasswire2
Jul 2022
#39