Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(6,977 posts)
29. The committee is not turning transcripts over to DOJ...
Sat Jul 16, 2022, 08:30 PM
Jul 2022
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/06/21/jan-6-committee-justice-department-transcripts-00040986


Once the department comes into possession of this material, they will likely be obligated to produce at least portions of it to some of the 800-plus defendants who have been charged to date by prosecutors based on their involvement in the siege of the Capitol. Even with so-called “protective orders” in place that nominally prevent defendants from widely disseminating discovery from the government, there is no realistic way to ensure that defendants or their lawyers will not share this material with people who are not supposed to have access to it. That, in turn, might allow people to coordinate their stories, and it could disincentivize other people from coming forward to speak to the committee.

As for the Justice Department’s position, it is understandable that they would want this material, but the suggestion that they are entitled to it is dubious at best. In order to satisfy their discovery obligations to criminal defendants, prosecutors are required to produce (among other things) any exculpatory evidence in their possession, but this is not evidence in the department’s possession
.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, finally. Pls let them concentrate on activities of the trump cabal after... brush Jul 2022 #1
TY DOJ! Cha Jul 2022 #2
Hire Neal Katyal and let him at em Deuxcents Jul 2022 #3
He was my choice for atty. general when Biden won. BComplex Jul 2022 #5
He would have Rebl2 Jul 2022 #18
Glenn Kirschner would be a great addition. n/t Paper Roses Jul 2022 #8
I think Glenn slightlv Jul 2022 #9
Yep Rebl2 Jul 2022 #19
slightlv......Correction.... Upthevibe Jul 2022 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Upthevibe Jul 2022 #31
🤜🤛👏👏 Traildogbob Jul 2022 #12
Glenn would have been great, as well. BComplex Jul 2022 #33
👍 Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #24
Good to hear!!!! K&R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Jul 2022 #4
Good news! bluestarone Jul 2022 #6
👍 Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #23
Something must be done to restore the rule of law in this country Mysterian Jul 2022 #7
👍 Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #22
I so hope this is true rurallib Jul 2022 #10
Gosh, I thought the DOJ was supposedly doing nothing! Novara Jul 2022 #11
Yes it is! Now I hope we get updates on continued expansion of the DOJ effort liberalla Jul 2022 #27
Have y'all forgotten about the 200+ additional lawyers hired yellowdogintexas Jul 2022 #35
I should hope to God! Hekate Jul 2022 #13
Oh really? You mean Rip Van Garland finally started waking up? calimary Jul 2022 #14
Rip Van Garland! SergeStorms Jul 2022 #28
I want a battalion of prosecutors........ bucolic_frolic Jul 2022 #15
👍 Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #21
YES! Because the only way to adjudicate this octopus quickly is to have more working on it! ancianita Jul 2022 #16
Yea, Yea, Yea. Heard it way too many times. Tacan Jul 2022 #17
Good Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #20
Am I missing something? LNM Jul 2022 #25
The committee is not turning transcripts over to DOJ... reACTIONary Jul 2022 #29
Hey, Merrick. LudwigPastorius Jul 2022 #26
babylonsister...........Kick N/T Upthevibe Jul 2022 #32
1-person can more manpower. That means there are two working on the case. Woo-Hoo.. Hotler Jul 2022 #34
Hopefully, they will beware of infiltrators. louis-t Jul 2022 #36
Blow it to fucking smithereens Blue Owl Jul 2022 #37
What this tells me is the the DoJ has been reluctant to pursue Trump and his cronies... Silent3 Jul 2022 #38
I thought that DoJ request for more funding to hire more was turned down by Congress. Grasswire2 Jul 2022 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: DOJ Brings In Mor...»Reply #29