Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(53,550 posts)
13. We will get destroyed politically if we push this, plus the complexities of who gets reparations
Sun May 7, 2023, 03:22 PM
May 2023

are maddeningly labyrinthine.

For instance, would I, as a racially mixed black US citizen, be eligible?

I am only a US citizen because of the American legal construct of unrestricted jus soli. I was born in Los Angeles in late 1996, but left before I was 2 years of age when my parents (non US citizens) moved us back to London.I did live in LA again as a young adult for several years as a uni student, but in total, I have lived in the US for less than 5 years, and I do not live there now. I am also the only US citizen in my family.

I have no desire to move back to the US at the present (which is very depressing, as the US should be the best overall, on balance, place on the planet to live IMHO). My wife (non US citizen) is vehemently against us moving back. The nation is simply too violent, too racist, too homophobic (we are married lesbians), too misogynistic, and too (overall) dangerous atm for my taste, and likely will be for ages.

My family is well off, I have zero economic need of any reparations from any nation, nor do I feel like I am owed any.

I would not accept any reparations from the US (or would simply use them all to help defeat the American RW), but I highly doubt that many in my situation would also turn them down or donate them all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

General Sherman promised something. jimfields33 May 2023 #1
Freedman's Bureau was authorized by Congress. NT Progressive Lawyer May 2023 #3
Wow. That changes things. Why weren't they given it? jimfields33 May 2023 #6
You are absolutely, positively wrong. hippywife May 2023 #2
I just don't agree...this is a losing issue for us politically...let's move into the future and Demsrule86 May 2023 #4
It doesn't matter... hippywife May 2023 #7
It is not the right thing to do if it helps elect Republicans...you have to deal with reality here. Demsrule86 May 2023 #17
We will get destroyed politically if we push this, plus the complexities of who gets reparations Celerity May 2023 #13
What an interesting life you have had...and I agree with what you say... Demsrule86 May 2023 #16
Former slaves were never promised wealth. They were promised an opportunity to gain wealth. Progressive Lawyer May 2023 #5
For which they were blocked at every turn. hippywife May 2023 #8
I never denied that they are owed. I said lumpsum payments are not analogous to 40 acres + mule. Progressive Lawyer May 2023 #9
However you identify... hippywife May 2023 #10
Agreed MutantAndProud May 2023 #11
What do you think that looks like? Happy Hoosier May 2023 #19
I like your idea. A lump sum would only be a temporary transfer of wealth. keithbvadu2 May 2023 #12
'Renewed interest in slavery reparations" does in no way mean popular support. Captain Stern May 2023 #14
Agree SickOfTheOnePct May 2023 #15
Most Americans don't have $400 for an emergency flamingdem May 2023 #18
Horrible Idea NowISeetheLight May 2023 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reparations for Black Sla...»Reply #13