Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Breaking - Jack Smith directly to Scotus: Decide slobby's immunity NOW. 👍 [View all]LAS14
(13,792 posts)75. Well, now. There's an interesting question!!! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Breaking - Jack Smith directly to Scotus: Decide slobby's immunity NOW. 👍 [View all]
mobeau69
Dec 2023
OP
It would have to be for all presidents IMO. Otherwise it would fall in the realm os a special law which is
mobeau69
Dec 2023
#9
You're welcome ! It did take a bit but I knew there was language that related to precedence....
Spazito
Dec 2023
#62
Great move. Don't let Trump huff and puff for 9 months, let's have it done now
bucolic_frolic
Dec 2023
#26
Good..cut him off at the knees. He was hoping to go thru the appeals court...wait a few months, appeal
PortTack
Dec 2023
#35