Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Clarence Thomas Scandal Is Somehow Looking Even Worse [View all]
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/clarence-thomas-scandal-somehow-looks-even-worseNo paywall link
https://archive.li/ycdNp
Before he began receiving expensive gifts and luxury vacations from Harlan Crow and other conservative benefactors, Clarence Thomas reportedly expressed significant concerns about his financial situationeven prompting concerns from a Republican lawmaker more than 20 years ago that he might resign from the Supreme Court if he could not boost his salary.
One or more justices will leave soon if justices arent given a raise, Thomas told then Republican Representative Cliff Stearns in 2000, as they flew home from a conservative conference at a Georgia resort, according to ProPublica.
I intend to look into a bill to raise the salaries of members of The Supreme Court, Stearns wrote to Thomas afterward. As we agreed, it is worth a lot to Americans to have the Constitution properly interpreted.
Congress ultimately did not give justices the major raise Thomas had pushed for, nor did it lift the ban on justices accepting speaking fees, as he had also sought. But a new ProPublica report raises questions as to how and why elite conservatives began lavishing the right-wing justice with gifts soon aftergifts that often went undisclosed by Thomas, in apparent defiance of federal law.
*snip*
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The people who bribe the Supreme Court determine the proper interpretation of US law.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2023
#27
Certainly the GOP has discovered that public office is the best grift around.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2023
#56
Obviously the people who bribe the Supreme Court determine what is proper interpretation.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2023
#45
#137K May Be a Pretty Modest Salary for a Senior Federal Employee, I Concede
The Roux Comes First
Dec 2023
#2
Pretty sure this was made public at the time. Thomas complained about not making what he would otherwise
Freethinker65
Dec 2023
#6
Q: How many billionaire friends would Clarence Thomas have if he weren't an Assoc. Justice?
Kid Berwyn
Dec 2023
#7
A Paid Endorsement...that's when a celebrity or public figure is paid to promote or support a product.
sop
Dec 2023
#30
While there may have been some form of compensation, that was something Thomas would volunteer for
JHB
Dec 2023
#19
"Nice conservative USSC you've got there. It would be a shame if anything happened to it" *
Oopsie Daisy
Dec 2023
#14
They didn't even need her. He should have been bounced before her name ever surfaced
JHB
Dec 2023
#20
Yes when he could not extort money from the US Congress, he set up a pay for play shop.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2023
#36
The Supreme Court most certainly does not have to worry about following ethics or the law.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2023
#38
It appears many 'laws' were enacted as if politicians were perceived as honorable
spanone
Dec 2023
#39
A fair to moderate lawyer can easily make 6 figures, good ones 7 and beyond.
bluesbassman
Dec 2023
#33
The GOP knows exactly what public service means. They just entirely reject that role.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2023
#35
I see nothing in Article III that protects Thomas from criminal prosecution.
Hermit-The-Prog
Dec 2023
#40