Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jedi Guy

(3,457 posts)
4. I feel like it's a stretch to say Murray was intentionally referencing or condoning Vick's actions.
Tue Sep 23, 2025, 07:06 PM
Sep 2025

He's 28 years old now so he'd have been 8 or 9 when Vick's animal cruelty came to light. Twenty years later I don't imagine it was top of mind when he put on that jersey. He probably just grabbed it and put it on without even thinking about it and then took the picture later in the day, again without even thinking about what he was wearing.

That strikes me as significantly more likely than some coded reference intended as support for Vick's cruelty to animals. Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity (or thoughtlessness, in this case). When it was brought to his attention he took down the picture.

This kinda strikes me as outrage for the sake of outrage.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cardinals' Kyler Murray a...»Reply #4