Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmbar2

(8,296 posts)
3. My theory...
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 10:26 PM
Apr 8

From what I understand, institutional investors are always hedged against major drops in markets, and take advantage of news to adjust their huge positions. They use AI to scan news reports, and trading algorithms immediately adjust their hedges when market news hits. They are in and out before the human traders even hear the news.

In the days leading up to Trump's threats, Big Money heavily hedged for a potential big dip if Trump carried out his threats against Iran. When Trump announced late yesterday afternoon that he would postpone Armageddon (fully anticipated move, and traded by insiders), it resulted in a violent reversal up in the Asian session of the futures market.

The overnight surge put a bunch of New York short hedges underwater. When the New York market opened, they had to cover their shorts today, forcing them to buy and driving up the market.

However, they can't do it all at once. Their orders are so big it would drive the price up even higher, making it more expensive to get out of their shorts. So they do programmed buys and sells at different times in the day, often triggered by news, to get the best prices. Like letting the air out of an over-inflated tire.

Some kind of news, or trigger, took the market down this afternoon on algorithmic selling, allowing more of them to cover their shorts at a better price, which drove the market up a second time.

I'm learning how this works by following TopStep TV during the day. It's a stock trading all-day broadcast whose personalities are all long-term market makers and traders. I could be wrong in this interpretation, but it is a possibility based on their commentary today.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can somebody explain why ...»Reply #3