Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]olddots
(10,237 posts)12. Suicide or murder ????
we won't find out either way and the anti imagination "experts" will turn their backs on reality as usual .
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]
Segami
Jul 2013
OP
Didn't say it was a bomb, it was someone acting way out of character over the days preceding
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#62
In this rare instance, I'll side with a corporate statement over the government's.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#2
At about 2:00 in the video you can see water bubbling out of the fire hydrant he sheared off
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#10
Hydrant's are mounted with shear bolts so that they shear off easily when hit.
xtraxritical
Jul 2013
#46
They are heavy and strong and can damage the underside of a car even after they have sheared off.
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#81
That's not true. Authorities believe it was less than 80 MPH but frankly until the forensic
Cleita
Jul 2013
#91
why not? if news outlets can't get the language right, i doubt they get the news right either.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#53
it's actually fairly important, as it tells us something about the media's ability to gather &
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#55
thank you. i can't believe how awful 'journalism' has become. it used to be something like
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#52
also care & quality in general. the ptb make a great display of talking about it, but i notice
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#99
They absolutely must have an INDEPENDENT investigation. We need to keep asking questions, too.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#23
And what caused the ruptured fuel tank to occur in the first place? Someone who 'was acting
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#57
And you are speculating that the physical facts, as reported, are the entire story of how
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#68
I love it - that reporter ain't buying the official line that foul play wasn't involved!
reformist2
Jul 2013
#17
How extensive are the test? Has Mercedes tested this with an investigative reporter as a driver?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#29
Just that the reporter said the engine, transmission, and rear end were scattered
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#95
So, the twinkie was just completely wrong & got the directions bassackward.
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#104
Drive train (not sure about the engine) is BEHIND the car...an impact would have launched
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#80
But the drive train was BEHIND the auto..why is that? Why would the drive train just FALL OFF?
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#87
It might be better to think of it as the car landed in front of the drivetrain
1-Old-Man
Jul 2013
#90