Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]anneboleyn
(5,613 posts)83. Over 100mph in a residential neighborhood I believe? Very strange indeed
especially for a man that was described by all of his friends as an "old woman" type of driver. Someone driving at that speed in such an area was (possibilities) very seriously impaired (not at all likely in this case), being outrageously, homicidally reckless (again very, very unlikely indeed), was being chased and was terrified for his/her life (unknown), or something more sinister was happening (I don't know anything about the possibility of the car being "hijacked" as has been suggested but this case is strikingly odd just on the surface given that this was so entirely out of character for this man -- not even considering the concern about his articles)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]
Segami
Jul 2013
OP
Didn't say it was a bomb, it was someone acting way out of character over the days preceding
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#62
In this rare instance, I'll side with a corporate statement over the government's.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#2
At about 2:00 in the video you can see water bubbling out of the fire hydrant he sheared off
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#10
Hydrant's are mounted with shear bolts so that they shear off easily when hit.
xtraxritical
Jul 2013
#46
They are heavy and strong and can damage the underside of a car even after they have sheared off.
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#81
That's not true. Authorities believe it was less than 80 MPH but frankly until the forensic
Cleita
Jul 2013
#91
why not? if news outlets can't get the language right, i doubt they get the news right either.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#53
it's actually fairly important, as it tells us something about the media's ability to gather &
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#55
thank you. i can't believe how awful 'journalism' has become. it used to be something like
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#52
also care & quality in general. the ptb make a great display of talking about it, but i notice
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#99
They absolutely must have an INDEPENDENT investigation. We need to keep asking questions, too.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#23
And what caused the ruptured fuel tank to occur in the first place? Someone who 'was acting
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#57
And you are speculating that the physical facts, as reported, are the entire story of how
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#68
I love it - that reporter ain't buying the official line that foul play wasn't involved!
reformist2
Jul 2013
#17
How extensive are the test? Has Mercedes tested this with an investigative reporter as a driver?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#29
Just that the reporter said the engine, transmission, and rear end were scattered
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#95
So, the twinkie was just completely wrong & got the directions bassackward.
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#104
Drive train (not sure about the engine) is BEHIND the car...an impact would have launched
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#80
But the drive train was BEHIND the auto..why is that? Why would the drive train just FALL OFF?
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#87
It might be better to think of it as the car landed in front of the drivetrain
1-Old-Man
Jul 2013
#90