Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)90. It might be better to think of it as the car landed in front of the drivetrain
Also, and you'd have to check on this, but I believe the engine and drivetrain are connected by a torque-tube in this application so whatever energy was applied to rip the engine out would also have had some effect on the drivetrain. At any rate I wouldn't claim to know how what happened but I do know that when the forces in an accident become strong enough to dislodge the engine that nothing else is safe either and parts will be scattered to the winds, so to speak. Other than that they all should be moving in about the same direction its hard to say much about where they will land.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]
Segami
Jul 2013
OP
Didn't say it was a bomb, it was someone acting way out of character over the days preceding
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#62
In this rare instance, I'll side with a corporate statement over the government's.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#2
At about 2:00 in the video you can see water bubbling out of the fire hydrant he sheared off
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#10
Hydrant's are mounted with shear bolts so that they shear off easily when hit.
xtraxritical
Jul 2013
#46
They are heavy and strong and can damage the underside of a car even after they have sheared off.
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#81
That's not true. Authorities believe it was less than 80 MPH but frankly until the forensic
Cleita
Jul 2013
#91
why not? if news outlets can't get the language right, i doubt they get the news right either.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#53
it's actually fairly important, as it tells us something about the media's ability to gather &
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#55
thank you. i can't believe how awful 'journalism' has become. it used to be something like
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#52
also care & quality in general. the ptb make a great display of talking about it, but i notice
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#99
They absolutely must have an INDEPENDENT investigation. We need to keep asking questions, too.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#23
And what caused the ruptured fuel tank to occur in the first place? Someone who 'was acting
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#57
And you are speculating that the physical facts, as reported, are the entire story of how
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#68
I love it - that reporter ain't buying the official line that foul play wasn't involved!
reformist2
Jul 2013
#17
How extensive are the test? Has Mercedes tested this with an investigative reporter as a driver?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#29
Just that the reporter said the engine, transmission, and rear end were scattered
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#95
So, the twinkie was just completely wrong & got the directions bassackward.
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#104
Drive train (not sure about the engine) is BEHIND the car...an impact would have launched
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#80
But the drive train was BEHIND the auto..why is that? Why would the drive train just FALL OFF?
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#87
It might be better to think of it as the car landed in front of the drivetrain
1-Old-Man
Jul 2013
#90