Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]Segami
(14,923 posts)100. Well, sometimes the crash itself is the evidence of murder.
Man jailed for murdering wife in car crash after disabling airbag
A former commercial airline pilot has been jailed for life after being convicted of deliberately driving his car into a tree to murder his wife in an "act of pure evil".
Iain Lawrence, 53, disabled the passenger airbag and moments before ploughing his car into the tree unclipped his wife Sally's seatbelt, because he could not cope with the break-up of their 12-year marriage.
On 6 October last year, just two days before the final part of the couple's divorce was due to be granted, Lawrence ploughed his car into a tree on Gartree Road in Oadby, Leicestershire at more than 50mph.
Mrs Lawrence died of "catastrophic" injuries, while her husband was uninjured after adopting the brace position during the collision.
Mr Justice Leggatt said: "It is clear to me from the evidence that you had two motives for murdering Sally. One was that you could not and would not accept that your marriage was over and were determined that Sally would never leave you.
"Your other motive was financial gain. You refused to accept that Sally should have the money from the house, although you had been advised that it was her due."
Lawrence had denied murder and claimed he suffered a leg spasm in the moments before the crash that left him unable to touch the brakes.
The jury heard Lawrence feigned unconsciousness in the driver's seat when passers-by stopped to help.
Witnesses described Lawrence, who initially told police he had no memory of the crash, as squeezing his eyes shut "like a child" at the scene.
The court heard details of the crash came back to him "in a nightmare" a month later.
Mr Justice Leggatt said: "The evidence at this trial has clearly established how you killed Sally. As you approached the spot which was your target, you reached across and unclipped her seatbelt. Then you steered the car at the tree and drove straight into it at over 50mph.
"You had the protection of an airbag and seatbelt protection you had made sure that Sally did not have; and to protect yourself further you got into the brace position before the crash.
"It was not chance but the results of your careful and cold-blooded planning, that you came away from the collision with a few bruises, while Sally died of catastrophic injuries.
"You thought that the crash would be seen as a tragic accident and that you would get away with murder. You would indeed have done so it if had not been for the careful and thorough investigation carried out by the police."
Family and friends of Mrs Lawrence clapped and shouted "yes" from the public gallery as the verdict was read out.
cont'
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/26/murder-car-crash-airbag-iain-sally-lawrence
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Mercedes Says THEIR CARS JUST DON'T BLOW UP!": The Michael Hastings Car Crash [View all]
Segami
Jul 2013
OP
Didn't say it was a bomb, it was someone acting way out of character over the days preceding
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#62
In this rare instance, I'll side with a corporate statement over the government's.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#2
At about 2:00 in the video you can see water bubbling out of the fire hydrant he sheared off
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#10
Hydrant's are mounted with shear bolts so that they shear off easily when hit.
xtraxritical
Jul 2013
#46
They are heavy and strong and can damage the underside of a car even after they have sheared off.
FarCenter
Jul 2013
#81
That's not true. Authorities believe it was less than 80 MPH but frankly until the forensic
Cleita
Jul 2013
#91
why not? if news outlets can't get the language right, i doubt they get the news right either.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#53
it's actually fairly important, as it tells us something about the media's ability to gather &
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#55
thank you. i can't believe how awful 'journalism' has become. it used to be something like
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#52
also care & quality in general. the ptb make a great display of talking about it, but i notice
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#99
They absolutely must have an INDEPENDENT investigation. We need to keep asking questions, too.
chimpymustgo
Jul 2013
#23
And what caused the ruptured fuel tank to occur in the first place? Someone who 'was acting
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#57
And you are speculating that the physical facts, as reported, are the entire story of how
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#68
I love it - that reporter ain't buying the official line that foul play wasn't involved!
reformist2
Jul 2013
#17
How extensive are the test? Has Mercedes tested this with an investigative reporter as a driver?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#29
Just that the reporter said the engine, transmission, and rear end were scattered
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#95
So, the twinkie was just completely wrong & got the directions bassackward.
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#104
Drive train (not sure about the engine) is BEHIND the car...an impact would have launched
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#80
But the drive train was BEHIND the auto..why is that? Why would the drive train just FALL OFF?
angstlessk
Jul 2013
#87
It might be better to think of it as the car landed in front of the drivetrain
1-Old-Man
Jul 2013
#90