Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
9. International joint statement on Syria
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 11:03 AM
Sep 2013
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 6, 2013
Joint Statement on Syria


The Leaders and Representatives of Australia, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States of America made the following statement on the margins of the Group of 20 Nations Leader’s Meeting in Saint Petersburg, Russia:

The international norm against the use of chemical weapons is longstanding and universal. The use of chemical weapons anywhere diminishes the security of people everywhere. Left unchallenged, it increases the risk of further use and proliferation of these weapons.

We condemn in the strongest terms the horrific chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21st that claimed the lives of so many men, women, and children. The evidence clearly points to the Syrian government being responsible for the attack, which is part of a pattern of chemical weapons use by the regime.

We call for a strong international response to this grave violation of the world’s rules and conscience that will send a clear message that this kind of atrocity can never be repeated. Those who perpetrated these crimes must be held accountable.

Signatories have consistently supported a strong UN Security Council Resolution, given the Security Council's responsibilities to lead the international response, but recognize that the Council remains paralyzed as it has been for two and a half years. The world cannot wait for endless failed processes that can only lead to increased suffering in Syria and regional instability. We support efforts undertaken by the United States and other countries to reinforce the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons.

We commit to supporting longer term international efforts, including through the United Nations, to address the enduring security challenge posed by Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles. Signatories have also called for the UN fact finding mission to present its results as soon as possible, and for the Security Council to act accordingly.

We condemn in the strongest terms all human rights violations in Syria on all sides. More than 100,000 people have been killed in the conflict, more than 2 million people have become refugees, and approximately 5 million are internally displaced. Recognizing that Syria’s conflict has no military solution, we reaffirm our commitment to seek a peaceful political settlement through full implementation of the 2012 Geneva Communique. We are committed to a political solution which will result in a united, inclusive and democratic Syria.

We have contributed generously to the latest United Nations (UN) and ICRC appeals for humanitarian assistance and will continue to provide support to address the growing humanitarian needs in Syria and their impact on regional countries. We welcome the contributions announced at the meeting of donor countries on the margins of the G20. We call upon all parties to allow humanitarian actors safe and unhindered access to those in need.

European signatories will continue to engage in promoting a common European position.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/09/06/1236783/-International-joint-statement-on-Syria

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023610073

The most important thing is holding Assad accountable and ensuring that he can't do this again.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Two-thirds of French oppose Syria action: poll dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #1
I forecast that French public opinion will swing further against intervention. David__77 Sep 2013 #2
Oh boy. The rhetoric is going to get more desperate and shrill now Catherina Sep 2013 #3
Good Morning, my dear. cali Sep 2013 #7
We have about 1% support for Obama in Oregon now. Coyotl Sep 2013 #10
And all 18 of them Aerows Sep 2013 #14
More people work in the defense industry than support Obama on this one! Coyotl Sep 2013 #24
And it's just not liberal districts like DeFazio's that are saying this. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #34
Same here :( Catherina Sep 2013 #11
That guy is full of bullshit. Coyotl Sep 2013 #38
Well- at some point blaming the rebels for the chemical attack will be put in CT forum. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #27
Oh, boy, the war-cheerleaders will have a sad RetroLounge Sep 2013 #4
You kiddin'? France has a reserved spot. Iggo Sep 2013 #22
After Libya and Mali Jeneral2885 Sep 2013 #5
Dear John please use the UN Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2013 #6
He had no difficulty convincing EU countries Assad used chemical weapons... Barack_America Sep 2013 #8
+1 SunSeeker Sep 2013 #15
Yes. It's a form of cowardice. Yes, Assad used chemical weapons & is almost assuredly going to again KittyWampus Sep 2013 #31
The US military FUCKING HELPED Hussein gas the Iranians (not sure about the Kurds) eridani Sep 2013 #54
International joint statement on Syria ProSense Sep 2013 #9
Nowhere in that statement does it call for unilateral military action on the part of the USA. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #17
EU: All info on Syria gas attack points to Assad ProSense Sep 2013 #20
We all agree that if he used chemical weapons on his own people he should be held accountable. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #28
excuse me? A huge number of DU'ers are totally unwilling to concede Assad used chemical weapons in KittyWampus Sep 2013 #35
I said "if" he used chemical weapons. Did Assad personally order the use of the weapons? Or totodeinhere Sep 2013 #43
There's just one teeny weeny problem with your personal preference... Beer Swiller Sep 2013 #45
I think you are confusing the International Court of Justice with the International Criminal Court. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #47
Oops. I stand corrected. I also stand by my basic point, however. Beer Swiller Sep 2013 #57
Fair enough. n/t totodeinhere Sep 2013 #58
That's more strongly worded than the headlines would suggest. SunSeeker Sep 2013 #18
Kerry is so funny LittleBlue Sep 2013 #12
Kerry was against it before he was for it. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #13
And that was before he was against it again n/t durablend Sep 2013 #32
Great post, but it really doesn't help me resolve my *personal*; ethical dilemma, sadly. ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #16
Great post. nt SunSeeker Sep 2013 #21
Thank you! ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #23
Punished how? I understand your sentiment cali Sep 2013 #29
In whatever way is most pointed and painful to his regime. ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #37
Does it make it okay that this very Administration chose to exonerate the Bush War Criminals sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #39
I didn't (and won't) make that argument. ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #44
It's not the past. The victims are still producing deformed babies and begging for help, right now. sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #46
I apologize, but I'm not going to follow you into that argument. ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #48
Something else? Are we not talking about War Crimes? sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #53
We're talking about violating the 1993 Geneva CWC, or at least I am. ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #56
Ask the Japanese who bombed them with nukes malaise Sep 2013 #51
Don't forget Poland. rug Sep 2013 #19
The guillotine casts a long shadow... Beer Swiller Sep 2013 #25
EU agrees that all indications on Syria chemical attack points to Assad KittyWampus Sep 2013 #26
Yes. The equivalent of the "strongly worded letter". It is not cali Sep 2013 #33
Most French know the difference between a shit sandwich and a macaron jsr Sep 2013 #30
Dear Coles School Teacher Sep 2013 #36
That's why I'm not advocating a military response, necessarily. ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #41
Obama's idol RR did nothing when Saddam used chemical weapons in the 1980s. jsr Sep 2013 #42
But Kerry speaks French and everything! polichick Sep 2013 #40
Oh that's it no more French Fries for me Chisox08 Sep 2013 #49
K&R woo me with science Sep 2013 #50
Kerry reminds me more of Robert McNamara everyday. dflprincess Sep 2013 #52
good comparison. cali Sep 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»France pulls back on supp...»Reply #9