Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)

2. The states had no obligation to set up their own exchanges.

Reply to WillyT (Original post)

Fri Nov 29, 2013, 09:23 PM

Nov 2013

The federal government does have an obligation to set up an exchange for those states. Your argument is basically that the law is bad and shouldn't have been set up like that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Serious Question: About The ACA Website Problems... Why Doesn't The Administration... [View all] WillyT Nov 2013 OP

The reason why, is because the administration really wants it to work for everyone lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #1

The states had no obligation to set up their own exchanges. DesMoinesDem Nov 2013 #2

Not My Argument At All... (And Thanks For Putting Word In My Mouth)... WillyT Nov 2013 #4

That does seem to be to your argument. DesMoinesDem Nov 2013 #5

Not quite, Oregon for example hasn't been able to sign up a single person on their website PoliticAverse Nov 2013 #3