Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

solarhydrocan

(551 posts)
14. the guy in the video fuels his car with it
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 09:52 AM
Dec 2013

he's using 6Li (lithium-6) H (hydride) for storage and he gets ~400 miles from the tanks you see in the still shot.

EDIT to add: BMW has a hydrogen car now, so does Honda

The future is closer than you think.

The BMW Hydrogen 7 is the world's first production-ready hydrogen vehicle. It's already proving itself in the real world too: we're putting 100 of them to the test as loan cars for leading figures from the worlds of culture, politics, business and the media, including Oscar-winning film director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck and Erich Sixt, chairman of rental car company Sixt AG.



Real-world experience shows that switching to hydrogen can go hand in hand with the comfort, dynamics and safety you'd expect from a BMW.
http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/technology/efficient_dynamics/phase_2/clean_energy/bmw_hydrogen_7.html



I repeat:

If a few billion dollars blown on the Middle East wars (>$2,000 per second) was spent on Hydrogen storage tech we'd already be independent


Water is (almost) everywhere- h20
Split the oxygen from the hydrogen in a garage with a battery-hooked to solar
put the gas in a tank

Some R+D would be able to solve this if the US wasn't spending all the time and brains on drones and spying

Former Area 51 employee Bob Lazar is interviewed by Visual Effects Supervisor Jon Farhat. In this video, they discuss what H1 (hydrogen) is, how it is created and it's potential in the automotive sector. In addition, Bob show us he has his own particle accelerator which he uses to create 6Li (lithium-6) H (hydride) for H1 storage.

6Li is used to store hydrogen safely and efficiently. It is also one of the key components in making a thermal-nuclear weapon, but by itself is not dangerous. Because of crony capitalism and ignorant politicians, the US government has banned 6Li and the buying and selling of it. However, the making of 6Li H yourself with your own particle accelerator IS NOT!

Bob uses solar panels to power an H1 generator which produces H1 from H2O (water). For the safe and efficient storage of the dangerous H1, 6Li H must be created with a particle accelerator and used for H1 storage in high compression tanks. With the H1 generator, H1 is forced into the 6Li H tanks through the syringe compression process.

Bob is the owner of of United Nuclear Scientific and Switch2Hydrogen. Jon is the owner of ODEMAX and director of this video.


If we can fly 2 men to the moon we can figure out how to store hydrogen.

And it's everywhere water is.


This poll doesn't provide a realistic picture of the alternatives. kristopher Dec 2013 #1
Youre right. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #3
If you gave the real options then your "poll" might be worth something intaglio Dec 2013 #2
Good points. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #4
No offence, i apreciate all the help. I wasnt born here. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #7
Renewables won't always be more expensive Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #16
I was not saying they are intaglio Dec 2013 #25
not trying to pick a fight here.. but.... Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #27
A poll can be skewed by not including options you do not agree with intaglio Dec 2013 #34
solar + hydrogen solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #5
Hydrogen is not an easy fuel to handle badtoworse Dec 2013 #13
the guy in the video fuels his car with it solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #14
You evidently know a lot more about it than I do badtoworse Dec 2013 #15
Electrolysis is not energy efficient. Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #17
It costs nothing but the initial investment to produce hydrogen solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #30
If you put 100 KWh in, you get maybe 75 KWh out Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #42
Yep, we need to switch to better more eco-friendly energy sources. n/t RKP5637 Dec 2013 #6
What about natural gas? This poll is meaningless without showing it as an option. badtoworse Dec 2013 #8
I dont agree with fracking. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #9
Very much so, but what difference does that make? badtoworse Dec 2013 #12
It may not be here to stay. Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #18
It's highly unlikely that fracking will stop anytime soon badtoworse Dec 2013 #23
I agree, it won't be soon Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #28
What makes you think a Democratic majority would end fracking? badtoworse Dec 2013 #29
I think that environmental and health concerns will factor in. Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #43
I think the ".........." option provides the greater promise for sustainable energy. Puzzledtraveller Dec 2013 #10
I'm sure I won't be the only person to say this but Nuclear and Coal are not synonymous el_bryanto Dec 2013 #11
We defenitly can and should use less energy. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #21
I have a 1310 sq ft house for just me and my gf... Javaman Dec 2013 #19
+1 million darkangel218 Dec 2013 #20
You have a very long way to go to replace 86.15 out of 95.1 Quads of annual usage. FarCenter Dec 2013 #22
We could try solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #31
US total electrical generation currently is over 1000 GW, about 30 times German solar. FarCenter Dec 2013 #32
size of land in sq miles of US: 3,536,290 solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #36
I'm fine with thinking outside the box -- I've done a lot of it in my career. FarCenter Dec 2013 #44
Bad Poll, where is the option to invest 100 billion into FUSION POWER! snooper2 Dec 2013 #24
I don't care for this poll. Laelth Dec 2013 #26
In the future, I'm sure fusion will pick up sakabatou Dec 2013 #33
I voted for blank Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #35
You are tempting me BainsBane Dec 2013 #37
You do know the rule, though Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #38
Since you insist BainsBane Dec 2013 #39
Harumph Harumph Harumph Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #40
That's over my head anyway BainsBane Dec 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Energy source Poll. pleas...»Reply #14