Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kirk Cameron Attempts to Out-Think Stephen Hawking and Fails Miserably [View all]arcane1
(38,613 posts)5. Fortunately, science doesn't work like that.
You don't just have people making claims and everyone believing them. It's all about peer review, testability, predictability, and falsifiability. Nothing is considered true (or close to the truth) just because someone said so.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kirk Cameron Attempts to Out-Think Stephen Hawking and Fails Miserably [View all]
napkinz
Dec 2013
OP
true, but you have to distinguish hawking's brilliant peer-reviewed stuff from his popular bullshit.
Vattel
Dec 2013
#24
Who said that you aren't as intelligent or don't understand his theories?
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2013
#49
...Thus proving several of Hawking's theories on the properties of black holes!
Scootaloo
Dec 2013
#40
LMAO.. I followed the links and found this little gem in the "history of insight" link:
SomethingFishy
Dec 2013
#18
He's just full of surprises, isn't he? I always hated Growing Pains, except for Leo DiCaprio
anneboleyn
Dec 2013
#21
Yes, because nothing says "Logic" like asserting without evidence the existence of magical beings
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#37
From Chuck Norris to Kirk Cameron, Famous ‘Christians’ Say STUPID Things (Videos)
napkinz
Dec 2013
#53