Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
33. No and yes.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Feb 2014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind

Theory of mind is a theory insofar as the mind is not directly observable.[1] The presumption that others have a mind is termed a theory of mind because each human can only intuit the existence of his/her own mind through introspection, and no one has direct access to the mind of another. It is typically assumed that others have minds by analogy with one's own, and based on the reciprocal nature of social interaction, as observed in joint attention,[4] the functional use of language,[5] and understanding of others' emotions and actions.[6] Having a theory of mind allows one to attribute thoughts, desires, and intentions to others, to predict or explain their actions, and to posit their intentions. As originally defined, it enables one to understand that mental states can be the cause of—and thus be used to explain and predict—others' behavior.[1] Being able to attribute mental states to others and understanding them as causes of behavior implies, in part, that one must be able to conceive of the mind as a "generator of representations".[7][8] If a person does not have a complete theory of mind it may be a sign of cognitive or developmental impairment.

Theory of mind appears to be an innate potential ability in humans, but one requiring social and other experience over many years to bring to fruition. Different people may develop more, or less, effective theories of mind. Empathy is a related concept, meaning experiential recognition and understanding the states of mind, including beliefs, desires and particularly emotions of others, often characterized as the ability to "put oneself into another's shoes". Recent neuro ethological studies of animal behaviour suggest that even rodents may exhibit ethical or empathic abilities.[9] Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development maintain that theory of mind is a byproduct of a broader hypercognitive ability of the human mind to register, monitor, and represent its own functioning.[10]

Research on theory of mind, in human and animal, adults and children, normally and atypically developing, has grown rapidly in the 35 years since Premack and Woodruff's paper, "Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?".[1] The emerging field of social neuroscience has also begun to address this debate, by imaging humans while performing tasks demanding the understanding of an intention, belief or other mental state.

An alternative account of theory of mind is given within operant psychology and provides significant empirical evidence for a functional account of both perspective taking and empathy. The most developed operant approach is founded on research on derived relational responding and is subsumed within what is called, "Relational Frame Theory". According to this view empathy and perspective taking comprise a complex set of derived relational abilities based on learning to discriminate and verbally respond to ever more complex relations between self, others, place, and time, and the transformation of function through established relations.
of course it is. Deep13 Feb 2014 #1
No. If that were true, we wouldn't have psychopaths ergo sociopaths. Cleita Feb 2014 #2
Actually both make a strong case otherwise Scootaloo Feb 2014 #15
Yeah, that's something to think about. Cleita Feb 2014 #16
Altruism is an conspecies trait, yeah Scootaloo Feb 2014 #18
Yes, compassion is innate. So is greed. liberal_at_heart Feb 2014 #3
I don't think greed is innate. ananda Feb 2014 #13
The great fear of scarity is induced by nature mostly Fumesucker Feb 2014 #30
Nope. Lots of folks running around out there with none of it. Squinch Feb 2014 #4
No gollygee Feb 2014 #5
Is a conscience the same as compassion? nt oldhippie Feb 2014 #7
Compassion requires empathy gollygee Feb 2014 #8
That doesn't make it a norm though, indeed, sociopathy is generally regarded as pathological... Humanist_Activist Feb 2014 #19
Yes but if you can be a human being and not have compassion gollygee Feb 2014 #20
I don't see how that follows, I would view sociopathy as a type of disability... Humanist_Activist Feb 2014 #23
He asked if having compassion is an inherent part of being a human being gollygee Feb 2014 #24
I think it can be taught or destroyed Warpy Feb 2014 #6
Just for hippies RobertEarl Feb 2014 #9
Hey Buddy! How ya doin'? oldhippie Feb 2014 #11
Since you aked: Starfish RobertEarl Feb 2014 #14
Sorry I asked ..... oldhippie Feb 2014 #25
Sure RobertEarl Feb 2014 #28
Not to be a himan being, only to be a humane being. eom uppityperson Feb 2014 #10
Obviously not YarnAddict Feb 2014 #12
I believe that human compassion billh58 Feb 2014 #17
No, but it sure helps. n/t Aerows Feb 2014 #21
Obviously not Armstead Feb 2014 #22
We are socialized according to the society we live in. bemildred Feb 2014 #26
No 2naSalit Feb 2014 #27
Compassion certainly isn't required to be a republican, or a member of the upper 1%. Initech Feb 2014 #29
See the film, "12 Years A Slave" for your answer. Yavin4 Feb 2014 #31
Yes... If You Want To Be A Humane Being... WillyT Feb 2014 #32
No and yes. rrneck Feb 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is compassion required to...»Reply #33