Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NJ teen loses first legal battle to make parents pay for education [View all]knitter4democracy
(14,350 posts)64. Apparently, it wouldn't apply to this year's FASFA.
I'm betting that's why.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
182 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My first thought too was that there's more background than curfew and boyfriend issues
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#80
If they really are telling her she can come home and that the college money is still there for her,
NYC Liberal
Mar 2014
#2
I am more in the mode that at 18 she is an adult. She can follow the rule or get out. n-t
Logical
Mar 2014
#11
All you say is true by law. Because we made it so. And we can make it be some other way by law. nt
Xipe Totec
Mar 2014
#86
If she wants to be independent she can get a job like so many her age are doing
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#121
"if the parents aren't there for the kid then the burden will fall on the tax payers" WHY?
demwing
Mar 2014
#122
'In New Jersey, emancipation is not contingent on becoming a legal adult at age 18
elleng
Mar 2014
#6
And from the court docs Rachel is in no way, shape or form "independent" like Hockeymom
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#164
Please read the court docs. Rachel's behavior is waayyy beyond some minor curfew infractions
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#163
This girl is NOT courteous. Telling her mother she wants to "shit all over her face"
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#171
Please read the court documents and then come back and tell us that you still think the parents
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#149
BTW, the parents said they were not withholding the college funds (which THEY paid for)
dionysus
Mar 2014
#27
bitter feelings i think. spoiled kid vs asshole parents? only they themselves know for sure
dionysus
Mar 2014
#30
and her friend's lawyer dad who realized he could pocket that college fund in legal fees...
dionysus
Mar 2014
#35
Oh wow. Thanks for that. Just as I suspected, Rachel is clearly in the wrong
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#148
Of course we don't have an inside look at their family but there's no denigration
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#167
They should pay the private school bill only because they signed a contract. Then tell........
Logical
Mar 2014
#14
That's what the parents and their lawyers are making sure the story is.
knitter4democracy
Mar 2014
#17
Given the shit she has done that you glossed over, maybe the parents are right
joeglow3
Mar 2014
#76
I just finished reading the court documents, and the people I find fault with are the parents
ScreamingMeemie
Mar 2014
#133
then she can go back home and follow the damn rules for a few more months
TorchTheWitch
Mar 2014
#21
Judge did no such thing. The ruling is just to keep everything the way it is.
knitter4democracy
Mar 2014
#38
I thought people that wrote stuff like this were unhinged Authoritarians who do not take kindly
Ikonoklast
Mar 2014
#132
She is staying with a friend whose parents do not need her assistance paying their mortgage.
bravenak
Mar 2014
#66
Well, fucking OBVIOUSLY... the Judge didn't hear BOTH sides of the story.
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2014
#75
As a parent, if you think the mental maturities of 14 & 18 yr olds are close, we have to disagree
joeglow3
Mar 2014
#115
I never read that the parents actually said they wouldn't give her the college money.
Captain Stern
Mar 2014
#95
They have said the college fund is still there. They have said she is welcome to move back
ScreamingMeemie
Mar 2014
#126
I don't think either side is giving enough information to determine if it is a good ruling or not.
NCTraveler
Mar 2014
#103
Did you read the court docs? She's got substance abuse issues, a serious disease
riderinthestorm
Mar 2014
#170