General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NJ teen loses first legal battle to make parents pay for education [View all]exboyfil
(18,366 posts)Before 1972, most states followed the common-law rule that an individual reached majority at the age of twenty-one.
http://www.law.uiowa.edu/documents/ilr/huitink.pdf
See id. (At common law the time one became of age was twenty-one. (citing 42 AM.
JUR. 2D Infants § 5, at 16 (2000))); Kathleen Conrey Horan, Post-Minority Support for College
EducationA Legally Enforceable Obligation in Divorce Proceedings?, 18 N.M. L. REV. 153, 155
(1988).
On the other hand you would have gotten far less traction for a child arguing that parent is obligated to pay for college. I think the obligation should only extend good, shelter, and clothing. As far as helping for college can anyone but the truly wealthy really help their children without risking their own retirement in today's age. The potential of large healthcare expenditures in the future especially long term care for example.
The rules about majority are really in place to protect the state.