Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 01:40 PM Apr 2014

We no longer have the rule of law in this country [View all]

Last edited Tue Apr 22, 2014, 03:03 AM - Edit history (1)

Sure, you can go to prison for stealing food if you are a serf, you can go to prison for growing a plant even. But the rule of law only applies to peasants. If you are a high government official, a thug doing their dirty work (rape, murder, torture, kidnapping, anything really) or are a billionaire that profits those in high public office (stealing billions in money or real estate, killing people by denying procedures and medicines as the "gatekeepers of health", or imprisoning people for the sake of profit) you are above the law, the law simply doesn't apply to you.

Once when these same facts were true in a monarchy that made the same distinctions regarding royalty and serf classes, there were those that rebelled against such an immune royalty which were allowed to abuse the people, steal everything from them (there homes, their health, even their lives) and face no consequences. Revolutions were fought and promises were made by the victors, Promises such as the rule of law applies to all or it applies to none. Promises that now ring hollow as the champions of a fair government slowly over time devolved back into what was and what always had been, a system of an elite few above laws possessing nearly all the wealth while laws were used exclusively against their victims - the majority that go hungry and grow sick under the rule of that elite.


We have come full circle now. Now it is common for a financial and political higher class to never have to fear laws that would imprison any commoner and we are supposed to accept this, cheer it even as the lord of our castle defeats the lord of some other castle. But the bread and circuses grow ever more scarce. The illusions of fairness ever more transparent, and the cruelties ever more severe.

If we are to follow laws that do not apply to our masters. If our masters are given the fruits of all of our labors while we search our dirt floors for crumbs as they laugh in their mansions discussing ways to extract even more from their impoverished serfs. Perhaps we are less than serfs, perhaps we are dogs that now only lick the hands of the masters that beat us. Perhaps the dream of shared prosperity and happiness has finally died within our hearts and our minds.

Perhaps we deserve our fate because we so meekly, even proudly in some cases accept it.



*this OP was inspired by this one that went largely unread as well as what is common knowledge regarding the financial elite in the speculative and banking "industries" that break laws with impunity and the blessing of our government

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
+1,000. blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #1
I must admit... KansDem Apr 2014 #2
The more things change.... wcollar Apr 2014 #3
That is reminiscent of the Supreme Ct. ruling -- Both rich and poor are free to contribute Arugula Latte Apr 2014 #14
If so few are capable of governing themselves how fewer still are capable of governing others? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #4
Yep. DeSwiss Apr 2014 #5
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose. zeemike Apr 2014 #48
About who had the right to vote: JDPriestly Apr 2014 #50
Thank you. Facts are in short supply even on Dem forums these days. Short, dismissive sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #65
shining post BelgianMadCow Apr 2014 #6
The ending of John le Carre's "Our Kind of Traitor" .. 2banon Apr 2014 #7
Than you for the information. Dragonfli Apr 2014 #19
I just deleted the ending summary short version from my post 2banon Apr 2014 #32
All I remember is sweat dreams, and flying machines, and pieces on the ground. Dragonfli Apr 2014 #34
Thanks. xfundy Apr 2014 #35
Kick,kick,kicked&Recommended! butterfly77 Apr 2014 #8
If we could rob banks obxhead Apr 2014 #9
+1 daleanime Apr 2014 #55
Men with guns can rob... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2014 #66
However, once those armed robbers are caught, they face serious time. obxhead Sep 2014 #67
Agreed discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2014 #68
I don't much care for rhetoric that intimates the neccesity of revolution. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #10
LOl! Yes, Must be the Gate Keepers of the Status Quo, come hell or high water! 2banon Apr 2014 #11
I am fine with working within the system to change things. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #13
Your dying breath will be spent obxhead Apr 2014 #16
Yes, I would have. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #17
Again, who's talking about "violent overthrow" anyway? This isn't the Teajahdist discussion board. 2banon Apr 2014 #18
Thank you for attempting to point out that posters fiction regarding me that was just that, fiction. Dragonfli Apr 2014 #22
.... 2banon Apr 2014 #33
Realy? xfundy Apr 2014 #37
WTF are you talking about? MohRokTah Apr 2014 #39
The OP points out injustice, and does not recommend a course of action. Ergo, you're wrong. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #57
Read it again. Revolution is in there. eom MohRokTah Apr 2014 #58
Let's just go to the source. Dragonfli, pardon me, but were you suggesting a revolution in the US? DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #59
The same rhetoric of revolution is used by the right wing CONSTANTLY MohRokTah Apr 2014 #60
Point out the part pushing revolution, and you may have a point. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #61
I was not advocating armed revolution else I would have stated plainly I believed such Dragonfli Apr 2014 #62
Thanks. I knew you had already answered, and that you weren't advocating revolution DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #63
The new DU differs in many ways from the one I joined. Dragonfli Apr 2014 #64
Did you have an argument on the content? TheKentuckian Apr 2014 #26
Exactly. This poster is the saddest Aerows Apr 2014 #29
I really do not care for you imposing motives or conclusions on my behalf, Dragonfli Apr 2014 #20
I've read your explanation before. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #21
How could you have read a previous explanation that I had not written? Dragonfli Apr 2014 #23
Because its nearly word for word what I read from wingnuts defending their veiled calls... MohRokTah Apr 2014 #24
Do you understand the English language and the words I actually write? Dragonfli Apr 2014 #25
Dragonfli, thank you for a very honest (bleak though it may be) dotymed Apr 2014 #49
We need a revolution, and quick MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #41
Revolutions are bloody affairs. eom MohRokTah Apr 2014 #42
Not necessarily. MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #43
1933? MohRokTah Apr 2014 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #45
I'm with you. We don't need to follow the historical pattern. Revolutions are very, very JDPriestly Apr 2014 #52
Yes, the American Revolution was the exception, not the rule. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #54
K&R marions ghost Apr 2014 #12
We do not. Aerows Apr 2014 #28
That is my opinion as well, at the very least we deserve a fair share of the fruits of our labor Dragonfli Apr 2014 #30
A fair share marions ghost Apr 2014 #38
Such is republic and oligarchy BlindTiresias Apr 2014 #15
We do not Aerows Apr 2014 #27
There are different laws depending on who you are. Rex Apr 2014 #31
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Apr 2014 #36
All the justice money can buy. 99Forever Apr 2014 #40
K&R. Spot on. MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #46
Excellent post malaise Apr 2014 #47
You are SOOOOO Wrong! Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #51
Recommend. KoKo Apr 2014 #53
Complete agreement, Dragonfli. Feral Child Apr 2014 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We no longer have the rul...