Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: GAME OVER, Warrenista Liberals! [View all]Paulie
(8,464 posts)18. Game over man!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
222 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Aw, be fair. I eg, totally depend on Sid to let me know what OPs I need to rec
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#91
LOL! I knew there was a reason I haven't put Sid and a few others on ignore yet.
Raksha
Apr 2014
#199
Too much fun laughing at them and fucking with them. You know, treating them as they like
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#206
Lol, true, but I have never used ignore. I depend on certain people to let me know which OPs I need
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#93
Nobody wants to look at you. You haven't produced a single useful post since
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#102
Posts like yours are what he lives for, so he can have them hidden and laugh and laugh and laugh.
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#108
He can try to have my posts hidden all he wants. That won't change the uselessness of his
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#164
Juror #6 ... I'm the jerk??? Hahahahahahhaaa! I especially liked Juror #4's response:
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#190
It's not nice to jump on someone when they are down. It's been a hard few months for The Group.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#209
I hope 'they' read your post here. I think you summed it up rather well. nt
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#215
The great and powerful Sid has spoken. Just stay away from the curtain. "Look at me" is your ....
marble falls
Apr 2014
#124
If posting useless commentary is considered nailing it, then yes, he did. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#168
"Wins the thread"?? I guess it depends on what game you guys are playing.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#180
Two shows daily! Don't forget to tip your waiter, and please, try the fish :)
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#12
It's a little too "inside baseball" but Manny is mining memes here on DU for material
Fumesucker
Apr 2014
#47
If the memes weren't there then Manny couldn't mock them so effectively, eh?
Fumesucker
Apr 2014
#67
If, by some measure, Warren is less Liberal than Klobuchar and Gillibrand
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2014
#99
I once saw it proved, objectively, that Detroit is the best place for skiers to live.
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2014
#113
Pledges not to run are as valid as pledges to roll back the Patriot Act. But that said,
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#217
I dont expect her to run unless we have a miracle, but not because she pledged.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#222
I've been terrified and fascinated by the number of times I've agreed with you lately.
Number23
Apr 2014
#61
Well, there's been worse, TBH. (But it's not all bad here, though! Keep reading.)
AverageJoe90
Apr 2014
#22
Yes, some do believe in "literal white privilege (whatever the heck that is) ...
1StrongBlackMan
Apr 2014
#85
And it passes with flying colors being that it upsets all the 'right' people. n/t
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#98
I would argue that my simple post has sparked more discussion than anything else in this thread.
BenzoDia
Apr 2014
#107
Don't like it? Dont' let the door hit you in the ass on your way to a better venue. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#103
But on the plus side, there's a good laugh to be had at how some of this is playing out.
BenzoDia
Apr 2014
#218
This is nothing new folks .. she endorsed Hillary months ago .. pay attention pay attention
YOHABLO
Apr 2014
#35
Blankfein just needs to be somewhat left on social issues and then it's all good.
stillwaiting
Apr 2014
#142
Yup, focused on the issues is where it is at and a pol will always be there to supply if there is
TheKentuckian
Apr 2014
#49
Liking aspects of a person doesn't mean you agree with the whole package.
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#111
85 recs and counting would beg to differ with your opinion, but thanks for playing.
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#133
you maybe don't get it. I think Warren or Bern would be great people to run, too.
dionysus
Apr 2014
#134
don't know, don't care. Recs haven't meant much of anything since they got rid of the Unrec feature.
dionysus
Apr 2014
#167
Ah, but when a politician says they aren't running, isn't that proof that they ARE running?
tclambert
Apr 2014
#154
Sorry, but it simply isn't compelling without at least four or five recursive blue links
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2014
#169
Dear old Manny... I have the feeling that if E. Warren DID get the Democratic nomination
Peacetrain
Apr 2014
#192
I thought when you click full ignore on a persons profile you will no longer see anything they post.
iandhr
Apr 2014
#197
This week's The New Yorker reviewer of her new book calls her pro-voucher stance reckless. Here
ancianita
Apr 2014
#200
I agree. It stood out as his most virulent opinion in the review. Perhaps he thinks the audience
ancianita
Apr 2014
#203
why does this MannyGoldstein guy try to sabotage the Democrats every chance he gets?
uhnope
Apr 2014
#214