Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: GAME OVER, Warrenista Liberals! [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)90. There may be only a few posters like that but they are extremely active
It really doesn't matter who runs from an economic perspective, anyone allowed to do so will be firmly under the thumb of the 1%.
Make your decisions on social issues because the economic ones are going to have a range of choices all the way from right wing to screaming nutjob right wing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
222 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Aw, be fair. I eg, totally depend on Sid to let me know what OPs I need to rec
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#91
LOL! I knew there was a reason I haven't put Sid and a few others on ignore yet.
Raksha
Apr 2014
#199
Too much fun laughing at them and fucking with them. You know, treating them as they like
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#206
Lol, true, but I have never used ignore. I depend on certain people to let me know which OPs I need
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#93
Nobody wants to look at you. You haven't produced a single useful post since
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#102
Posts like yours are what he lives for, so he can have them hidden and laugh and laugh and laugh.
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#108
He can try to have my posts hidden all he wants. That won't change the uselessness of his
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#164
Juror #6 ... I'm the jerk??? Hahahahahahhaaa! I especially liked Juror #4's response:
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#190
It's not nice to jump on someone when they are down. It's been a hard few months for The Group.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#209
I hope 'they' read your post here. I think you summed it up rather well. nt
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#215
The great and powerful Sid has spoken. Just stay away from the curtain. "Look at me" is your ....
marble falls
Apr 2014
#124
If posting useless commentary is considered nailing it, then yes, he did. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#168
"Wins the thread"?? I guess it depends on what game you guys are playing.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#180
Two shows daily! Don't forget to tip your waiter, and please, try the fish :)
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#12
It's a little too "inside baseball" but Manny is mining memes here on DU for material
Fumesucker
Apr 2014
#47
If the memes weren't there then Manny couldn't mock them so effectively, eh?
Fumesucker
Apr 2014
#67
If, by some measure, Warren is less Liberal than Klobuchar and Gillibrand
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2014
#99
I once saw it proved, objectively, that Detroit is the best place for skiers to live.
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2014
#113
Pledges not to run are as valid as pledges to roll back the Patriot Act. But that said,
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#217
I dont expect her to run unless we have a miracle, but not because she pledged.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#222
I've been terrified and fascinated by the number of times I've agreed with you lately.
Number23
Apr 2014
#61
Well, there's been worse, TBH. (But it's not all bad here, though! Keep reading.)
AverageJoe90
Apr 2014
#22
Yes, some do believe in "literal white privilege (whatever the heck that is) ...
1StrongBlackMan
Apr 2014
#85
And it passes with flying colors being that it upsets all the 'right' people. n/t
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#98
I would argue that my simple post has sparked more discussion than anything else in this thread.
BenzoDia
Apr 2014
#107
Don't like it? Dont' let the door hit you in the ass on your way to a better venue. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#103
But on the plus side, there's a good laugh to be had at how some of this is playing out.
BenzoDia
Apr 2014
#218
This is nothing new folks .. she endorsed Hillary months ago .. pay attention pay attention
YOHABLO
Apr 2014
#35
Blankfein just needs to be somewhat left on social issues and then it's all good.
stillwaiting
Apr 2014
#142
Yup, focused on the issues is where it is at and a pol will always be there to supply if there is
TheKentuckian
Apr 2014
#49
Liking aspects of a person doesn't mean you agree with the whole package.
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#111
85 recs and counting would beg to differ with your opinion, but thanks for playing.
Electric Monk
Apr 2014
#133
you maybe don't get it. I think Warren or Bern would be great people to run, too.
dionysus
Apr 2014
#134
don't know, don't care. Recs haven't meant much of anything since they got rid of the Unrec feature.
dionysus
Apr 2014
#167
Ah, but when a politician says they aren't running, isn't that proof that they ARE running?
tclambert
Apr 2014
#154
Sorry, but it simply isn't compelling without at least four or five recursive blue links
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2014
#169
Dear old Manny... I have the feeling that if E. Warren DID get the Democratic nomination
Peacetrain
Apr 2014
#192
I thought when you click full ignore on a persons profile you will no longer see anything they post.
iandhr
Apr 2014
#197
This week's The New Yorker reviewer of her new book calls her pro-voucher stance reckless. Here
ancianita
Apr 2014
#200
I agree. It stood out as his most virulent opinion in the review. Perhaps he thinks the audience
ancianita
Apr 2014
#203
why does this MannyGoldstein guy try to sabotage the Democrats every chance he gets?
uhnope
Apr 2014
#214