Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gore not becoming President: whose fault? [View all]Uncle Joe
(58,358 posts)103. Thanks, LondonReign, I view the corporate media as the
preeminent cause for the coup of 2000.
Had they been honest brokers instead of acting as an institution bent on giving Bush a free pass while slandering and libeling Al Gore, none of the rest would've mattered, Gore would've won in a landslide.
CNN held a poll as to the most revolutionary invention or creation of the 20th century and the Internet won hands down, despite this, the corporate media as an institution could never bring themselves to give actually give Gore credit for his visionary legislation in opening the Information Superhighway to the people.
All they could do was ridicule him, and I have no doubt it was because they saw the growing Internet as a potential threat to their propaganda power and commercial cash cow, so they didn't want the strongest political champion of the Internet in the White House.
The Internet has been under attack by them ever since, specifically in trying to eliminate Net Neutrality while turning the net in to the equivalent of cable television.
Whatever it takes to keep the American People under their thumb.
Had they been honest brokers instead of acting as an institution bent on giving Bush a free pass while slandering and libeling Al Gore, none of the rest would've mattered, Gore would've won in a landslide.
CNN held a poll as to the most revolutionary invention or creation of the 20th century and the Internet won hands down, despite this, the corporate media as an institution could never bring themselves to give actually give Gore credit for his visionary legislation in opening the Information Superhighway to the people.
All they could do was ridicule him, and I have no doubt it was because they saw the growing Internet as a potential threat to their propaganda power and commercial cash cow, so they didn't want the strongest political champion of the Internet in the White House.
The Internet has been under attack by them ever since, specifically in trying to eliminate Net Neutrality while turning the net in to the equivalent of cable television.
Whatever it takes to keep the American People under their thumb.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, if Al Gore had won his home state of Tennessee, Florida wouldn't have mattered.
Electric Monk
Jun 2014
#19
If nader didn't run Gore could have spent more time in TN instead of NM, WI, IA, and OR.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#102
No, they did not. Between 40 and 45% of the electorate didn't vote at all.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2014
#38
I suggested no such thing. I did say the electorate did not vote for Gore...
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2014
#65
Put it this way-- the Americans who cast their votes in November 2000 preferred Gore
Art_from_Ark
Jul 2014
#66
You might want to edit your post. There's a part in the middle where you appear to be
winter is coming
Jun 2014
#8
Thanks; that makes more sense. It was kind of like autocorrect on acid there for a while. n/t
winter is coming
Jun 2014
#16
yes sorry for the confusion. I'm posting from my hospital bed and my fingers no work so good.
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2014
#20
"Al Gore claimed to have invented the Internet" Which I believe truly explains their vitriol toward
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#34
I think a reasonable case could be made Gore would have won NM, WI, IA, and OR by bigger margins
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#108
The economy was flying. It shouldn't have been close enough to steal, lose or fuck up in any way.
LeftyMom
Jul 2014
#63
Supreme Court because they are supposed to uphold the law. Brother Jeb second
McCamy Taylor
Jun 2014
#36
USSC, BushCo. cronies, conservative Democrats, Gore, yellow, mealy mouth Democrats in that order.
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#45
All of those things are irrelevant when the critical point is aknowledged: Gore won.
morningfog
Jul 2014
#116
Katharine Harris and Jeb Bush paying Diebold $4 million to cleanse the voter rolls of minorties
Tony_FLADEM
Jul 2014
#51
After re-watching George Carlin: Jammin' in New York, I wonder if he voted Nader in 2000?
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#67
While other people had an effect, Nader was the single progressive with the greatest
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#68
how about the damn media? ragging on gore's sighs and sweaters and supposed "lies"?
unblock
Jul 2014
#76
oh, they were so tough on shrub. the teetotaler you'd love to have a beer with!
unblock
Jul 2014
#80
Seeing how Gore really won Florida, the Supreme Court is the only logical answer!
B Calm
Jul 2014
#78
I blame the Democratic reviewers who approved the wonky design of the Palm Beach ballot
LonePirate
Jul 2014
#79
but even with all the dirty shenanigans that went on in Florida, Gore still had more votes.
B Calm
Jul 2014
#82
The SC would never had intervened as there would have been no month long recount
LonePirate
Jul 2014
#83
You should have also included the spinless Dems in Congress as an option...nt
joeybee12
Jul 2014
#84
Jeb and Harris--but the people blaming Nader KNOW that, as much as Rummy and Cheneybeast
MisterP
Jul 2014
#98
I refused to select because trying to name one is comparing apples and oranges.
Jim Lane
Jul 2014
#115