General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do I have this right? There are DUers who [View all]Chan790
(20,176 posts)Joe I. Lieberman held his seat in the race against Lamont and Schlesinger because Schlesinger was a degenerate gambler up to his eyeballs in debt and barred from the casinos who refused the CTGOP demand that he withdraw so they could replace him on the ticket. In response, the RNC basically endorsed Lieberman, stopping just short of giving him money. As a result, Lieberman retained his seat by getting more votes from registered Republicans than Schlesinger did and breaking even on unaffiliated.
Joe had no Joementum among Democrats, he lost Democrats handily. The DNC poured money into the race for Lamont and he drew frequent appearances from major Democratic figures because it was considered a tough race, both because Lieberman was an incumbent with high approval ratings outside of the party that just dumped him and because CT's 2nd largest industry is defense manufacturing. (CT, like NoVA, is home to a metric shit-ton of hawkish Democrats and liberal unaffiliateds who know well (and vote accordingly) that anti-war means layoffs for Pratt&Whitney, Raytheon and EB. You find as many isolationist conservatives in CT as anti-war liberals.)
But, you know, never let facts fuck up a righteous rant.