Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Witness to fighter pilot's comments after airliner's destruction passes lie detector test. [View all]Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)31. interesting theory
All that means is the pilot could have been saying he was the intended target for the missile, and is suffering through survivor's guilt for the rebels having brought down the airliner instead.
and more plausible than the OP's theory.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
154 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Witness to fighter pilot's comments after airliner's destruction passes lie detector test. [View all]
another_liberal
Dec 2014
OP
'Ukrainian military worker' claims one of his country's fighter jets shot down MH17 after confusing
bemildred
Dec 2014
#11
MH17: Russian investigators claim proof from witness that Ukrainian pilot involved in downing of fli
bemildred
Dec 2014
#12
"an Su-25 fighter pilot had fired his air-to-air missiles at the wrong aircraft."
EX500rider
Dec 2014
#26
What do you think the response of the Russians would be to Putin being murdered by..
EX500rider
Dec 2014
#50
Assuming there is enough access to the wreckage, this should be a solvable question...
Sancho
Dec 2014
#14
The rebels shot down several planes before this. AFAIK, the government shot down none.
pampango
Dec 2014
#16
But after their first few train robberies they were suspects in later robberies moreso
pampango
Dec 2014
#21
You actually think the RT nonsense posted in the OP deserves intelligent replies?...
SidDithers
Dec 2014
#55
Do you imagine that another_liberal will stop postingto spare himself your disdain?
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#62
Don't worry about it. You'll never find it. Many have tried, and failed. Someone tried to pass...
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2014
#79
"subordinate to the president" doesnt mean precisely the same thing as "works directly for
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#124
Screw that! Next thing you know, you'll be telling us to disregard the National Enquirer!
randome
Dec 2014
#117
I have a firm policy: if the National Enquirer AND The Star run the same headline, then it's true...
brooklynite
Dec 2014
#118
So we're supposed to forget all the recorded radio traffic between the Russian army and rebels?
Calista241
Dec 2014
#129
The Polygraph, while not admissible as trial evidence, is widely used by investigators . . .
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#141
You're an expert on the efficacy of the Polygraph and other "Stress testing?"
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#144