Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: It's early, but [View all]

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
93. We no longer have such a party. Once the Democratic party was the party of labor until this:
Mon Jun 15, 2015, 02:28 PM
Jun 2015

Last edited Mon Jun 15, 2015, 05:04 PM - Edit history (1)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12774832

Now we have a hybrid party that took the equality stances the party stood for and fused it with the economic platform made famous by Reagan and Thatcher.

It also appears as tho their Idea of middle class only includes six figure incomes as evidenced by Hillary's belief that raising the cap on payroll taxes (that caps it a around 100,000 dollars a year) and Obama's belief that much of bush's tax cuts had to be kept so that the middle class individuals in the 200,000 range and families in the 250,000 range would not be over taxed.

The other poster is correct, Bernie is working for the working class and the invisible (now) poor that neither party mentions except as a means to cut the budget.

Unfortunately, even in a Sander's administration, the workers and the poor would need an accompanying movement and more politicians elected that are willing to forgo the fortunes that are to be made by working for the comfortable and extremely well to do and vote to help pass his common sense working party values, he admits this fact and is challenging us to provide the movement and vote for the politicians required to save us from third world neoliberal exploitation of the working class and the starved euthanasia of the poor.

This will all have to happen within the Democratic party however because this is a two party system set up that way from the beginning, that is why he caucuses with the Democrats as do others that work for the working class and poor, most of which are already in the party (all is not bleak however because there are at least 90 to 100 such working people supporters that are ignored yet still present within the party)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's early, but [View all] Emily Grierson Jun 2015 OP
If voters are blinded by glitz, gender and name-recognition... WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2015 #1
Nah, I think the voters overwhelming back Hillary Clinton. Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #2
...because of glitz, gender and name-recognition. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2015 #3
She killed it in her speech. Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #4
lol. she attracted the same number of people to her kickoff cali Jun 2015 #7
hahahaha Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #8
hi mags cali Jun 2015 #10
Most definitely. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2015 #15
Aren't socks during one's timeout a bannable offense? BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #35
I thought it was, until they gave BainsBane a pass. n/t demmiblue Jun 2015 #71
It all depends on who the sock is posting for. Autumn Jun 2015 #83
BINGO! QC Jun 2015 #97
Name recognition. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2015 #12
Blondie had a song about that, Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #16
Just like she was in 2008, eh? (n/t) WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2015 #18
Little Miss Inevitable has one prob, the more people see of her the less they like her peacebird Jun 2015 #77
She may be, but doubts are starting to creep in. GoneOffShore Jun 2015 #79
It's patronizing to our fellow Democrats to suggest they support a candidate... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #81
It's patronizing to our fellow Democrats to demand they support a candidate.... jeff47 Jun 2015 #82
It is patronizing that you would suggest I am instructing others how to vote... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #84
It is patronizing to pretend your posting history started today. jeff47 Jun 2015 #85
Find one post where I made that argument DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #86
Let's review 2008 brooklynite Jun 2015 #92
Geez, if the world could nominate a President, it would be Hillary Clinton. DonCoquixote Jun 2015 #69
What was it about her speech that elevated your opinion up to ladjf Jun 2015 #80
are you speaking for all of those voters? treestar Jun 2015 #72
Based on what? rocktivity Jun 2015 #23
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #24
Eight years ago, not even Barack Obama was a Barack Obama rocktivity Jun 2015 #27
I've still haven't meet a voter in person..... daleanime Jun 2015 #33
probably, mags. oops, i mean emily cali Jun 2015 #5
I'm quite certain she will win Vermont. Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #6
remember dean? he won here even though he'd dropped out by then cali Jun 2015 #9
I like Bernie Sanders, Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #13
Why? NewSystemNeeded Jun 2015 #17
I do like his economic message, but I'm not sure what he is trying to gain here? Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #19
exceptionally ethically challenged. exceptionally dodgy. yep, she's exceptional. cali Jun 2015 #22
Why do you think treating his candidacy as a joke helps your candidate? Ken Burch Jun 2015 #28
you actually said that? quickesst Jun 2015 #61
I don't have 90% of Bernie's supporters on ignore. As a Bernie supporter, why would I? Ken Burch Jun 2015 #63
You're not the only one who has that dream. NewSystemNeeded Jun 2015 #11
good luck with that. Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #14
kick Emily Grierson Jun 2015 #20
You're not really supposed to "kick" your own posts. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #31
..and is also a strong indicator of the existence of a Sock. bvar22 Jun 2015 #95
Welcome to DU! How did you find out about us? nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #21
90 days is too long to stay away! BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #34
Hi, Mr. Sock Puppet! Remember, kids, always try to change your posting behavior when sock-puppeting! Bonobo Jun 2015 #37
I hadn't thought of that one BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #38
No. Mags was a better writer. Not a clear child. nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #40
I wonder if MIRT will be willing to find out BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #42
I believe "Emily" has been flagged for review. nt Bonobo Jun 2015 #50
PPR'd. L0oniX Jun 2015 #102
LMAO! beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #39
Right? BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #41
Obvious sock is obvious. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #43
Couldn't even get halfway through her own thread! BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #44
Didn't Queen have a song about that? beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #45
So much enthusiasm BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #46
Been there! beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #48
*chucklesmirk* BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #51
Gosh Flying Squirrel Jun 2015 #25
Just like 2008!! jeff47 Jun 2015 #26
what if Obama was not running ? JI7 Jun 2015 #36
Then one of the other candidates would have exploited the mistakes. jeff47 Jun 2015 #76
Welcome to DU Emily Grierson. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #29
There's no reason to say something that arrogant. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #30
Lol, Tipperary Jun 2015 #32
Her account is currently "flagged for review". Ken Burch Jun 2015 #55
I think it's a sock. cwydro Jun 2015 #96
She's now been 'stoned. n/t. Ken Burch Jun 2015 #100
Is this NYC_SKP with a new handle and trying to be funny? B Calm Jun 2015 #47
He would not do that. Calm down! akbacchus_BC Jun 2015 #52
BS, LOL B Calm Jun 2015 #53
Looks like you here to pick a fight and get people banned! akbacchus_BC Jun 2015 #54
What intrigues me is that a country with over 400 million people akbacchus_BC Jun 2015 #49
Bernie is Kalidurga Jun 2015 #59
We no longer have such a party. Once the Democratic party was the party of labor until this: Dragonfli Jun 2015 #93
Not that I can prove anyone is a sock puppet DonCoquixote Jun 2015 #56
Yep! leftofcool Jun 2015 #57
you could have said the same thing in 2007, except change "Sanders" to Obama in your last sentence corkhead Jun 2015 #58
You better check NH again. She's losing ground fast. Exilednight Jun 2015 #60
HRC has a ton of support in Texas Gothmog Jun 2015 #62
How I long for an UNREC button - nt KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #64
Just click the op's 'profile' button. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #65
Scottie, I think this is the start of a beautiful friendship! ;) - nt KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #66
! beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #67
You would most likely be correct if it were simply Hillary v Sanders. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #68
Exactly. Counting all those states as a win for one candidate is a mistake. FSogol Jun 2015 #73
I remember the fable very well. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #74
I'm sorry catnhatnh Jun 2015 #88
I'm not sure I understand. You aren't the op. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #91
At that point Sanders will endorse Hillary, and a lot of heads will be exploding. DanTex Jun 2015 #70
Correct alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #75
Y'all be sure to ban the knitter of this sock too, mmmk? tkmorris Jun 2015 #78
I suspect they already did foo_bar Jun 2015 #94
meh. time will tell who wins what. magical thyme Jun 2015 #87
Vermont? KamaAina Jun 2015 #89
I don't expect him to drop out... brooklynite Jun 2015 #90
This message was self-deleted by its author hrmjustin Jun 2015 #98
Meh. My mother adores Hillary, and she's voting for Bernie. ladyVet Jun 2015 #99
He's not the only one who will drop out. Some people will not vote for anyone who is backed by... L0oniX Jun 2015 #101
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's early, but»Reply #93