Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Praek3

(149 posts)
37. Two additional gun purchaser requirements to consider:
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 04:59 PM
Dec 2015

1. No health insurance coverage for any/all gun injuries for gun owners unless they pay an extra and specific premium for insurance coverage. Just like many feel is appropriate for women to have birth control coverage within their health insurance policies.

2. No federal funds permitted to be used to cover gun owner related gun injuries or deaths. If you want a gun and are injured by your gun, pay for any negative results by yourself. Just as no federal funds can be used to pay for abortion services.

Fair is fair.

Nothing has ever been achieved without a start somewhere. It all started when they "gave" women libdem4life Dec 2015 #1
Do women in Missouri TeddyR Dec 2015 #2
I think it was proposed in the original legislation justiceischeap Dec 2015 #4
That's ridiculous TeddyR Dec 2015 #11
Now that's PRO-LIFE ! nt eppur_se_muova Dec 2015 #3
I love this irony librechik Dec 2015 #5
I LOVE IT!!!!! Politicalboi Dec 2015 #6
Gun dysfunction! Hepburn Dec 2015 #12
K&R. nt DLevine Dec 2015 #7
Brilliant. blackspade Dec 2015 #8
Don't forget the mandatory Freddie Dec 2015 #9
A rifle barrel would do nicely...IMO Hepburn Dec 2015 #13
Prostate exam! catrose Dec 2015 #33
And the obvious inverse proportionality of gun size to.....well you know Augiedog Dec 2015 #10
good for her!!! niyad Dec 2015 #14
Add in an anal ultrasound. Cassiopeia Dec 2015 #15
Put semi-automatic weapons in the same category Doc_Technical Dec 2015 #16
This needs to be spread far and wide DebbieCDC Dec 2015 #17
Your subject line in the same thread with anal u/s suggestions... Pacifist Patriot Dec 2015 #27
Stacey... Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #18
Such a good idea... Thespian2 Dec 2015 #19
Ok, legal teams at pp, Naral, etc..get going and this done in every state Gloria Dec 2015 #20
I agree. Use an every state strategy and get it going! Pacifist Patriot Dec 2015 #26
OMFG I love her! marym625 Dec 2015 #21
And it doesn't deny the right to bear the arm! Beartracks Dec 2015 #22
The faster weapons are sold justiceischeap Dec 2015 #24
Like a movie: the bad guys sell mind control devices as harmless consumer goods!! Beartracks Dec 2015 #36
They should add a privision requiring a rectal examination with... Nitram Dec 2015 #23
"Now just sit back, sir... Gumboot Dec 2015 #25
To be fair, this proposed legislation should apply only to men, with an exemption for trans-gender NCjack Dec 2015 #28
It should apply to everyone daybranch Dec 2015 #29
The comparison is to treat men as they treat women. Men don't get abortions. /nt NCjack Dec 2015 #31
If men homegirl Dec 2015 #34
Good stuff ronbison Dec 2015 #40
We need to sweep the national elections and get this passed nationally . . . another_liberal Dec 2015 #30
While we're at it, let's throw in a transanal ultrasound for good measure. southerncrone Dec 2015 #32
I love smart people world wide wally Dec 2015 #35
Two additional gun purchaser requirements to consider: Praek3 Dec 2015 #37
More than fair. N/t tooeyeten Dec 2015 #39
Stacey Newman tooeyeten Dec 2015 #38
This would be much more important to pass. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #41
I disagree Elmergantry Dec 2015 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Missouri State Rep Files ...»Reply #37