Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, where were all the good guys with guns? [View all]Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)63. However, it is the argument offered against restricting
the type of weapons people can buy, the type of ammunition, the capacity of magazines and the types of people who should be prohibited from buying them.
So again, my question is valid. Why didn't the "good guys with guns" stop the "bad guys with guns"? Why did the police have to resort to a bomb in order to stop a single bad guy with a gun? They police chief said that it would have been too dangerous to use anything short of a bomb, so what next? The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a bomb, so let's legalize bombs?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Helps to know the full story, rather than only that part which validates your bias.
LanternWaste
Jul 2016
#56
Do you have any concrete evidence to support your assertion of saving thousands of lives. We do
madinmaryland
Jul 2016
#29
The problem with that study is it doesn't prove a gun was required to stop the
MillennialDem
Jul 2016
#46
So they don't matter, right? Way to treat people with mental illness like depression and
MillennialDem
Jul 2016
#47
Good, I'm glad you do. I just don't like when people brush suicides under
MillennialDem
Jul 2016
#50
I'm sorry about your friend. But again, the thing is guns are the easiest way to
MillennialDem
Jul 2016
#55
No, I really don't view that way (honest). If others do, I obviously can't speak for
MillennialDem
Jul 2016
#60
I don't know the exact details, but if the cops had a clear shot at this guy, they
frankieallen
Jul 2016
#87
Yes, he is a coward because he shot innocent people from a distance. Apparently you disagree?
frankieallen
Jul 2016
#90
Your post needs correction: The bearing of arms is for self-defense, not for an LEO auxillary...
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#104
If they are like me, sitting at home with their family, guns are unloaded and stored
In_The_Wind
Jul 2016
#2
In the area? Sure. In someone's possession at a location to actually get a shot? Doubtful.
Lizzie Poppet
Jul 2016
#31
Plenty of rifles AND handguns. For self-defense, not a private police force, ye of little faith...
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#108
it was nearly 9pm. who is out on the streets at that time but dangerous thugs? nt
uncle ray
Jul 2016
#71
I'm guessing, that to avoid ending up like that guy in Minnesota, they left them at home.
krispos42
Jul 2016
#28
This is a subject in which the ignorant are often proud of their ignorance
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2016
#73
I think your confusion lies in thinking so many lawful gun owners are "Rambo wanna-be heroes".
jmg257
Jul 2016
#58
You are a good guy with a gun, until that nanosecond you decide to become a bad guy with a gun.
Rex
Jul 2016
#72
Penis-talk gives way to self-defacation. Dialog improves, but it doesn't clear the atmosphere!
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#112