Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Not continuing to run would be ‘outrageously undemocratic,’ Bernie Sanders says [View all]Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)134. "Why would you not allow half the people to vote?" he asked. "That is outrageously undemocratic"
!!!!!!!!!!!!B-I-N-G-O!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not continuing to run would be ‘outrageously undemocratic,’ Bernie Sanders says [View all]
blueintelligentsia
Mar 2016
OP
You don't have half the people behind you Bernie. Your down by over a million votes so far.
upaloopa
Mar 2016
#1
She said the same thing in 08 when folks were calling her to drop out to unite the party
motionspotlight
Mar 2016
#141
It's about delegates, not votes. But you knew that, right? She still needs over 1000 delegates
jillan
Mar 2016
#14
Who we elect as the nominee is everybody's problem. The sooner we can make that decision
pnwmom
Mar 2016
#107
You expect a "unified front" by not letting 24 states have a chance to vote?
Fantastic Anarchist
Mar 2016
#116
Yup, those red states we'll never win sure came through for Hillary, all right! n/t
ColesCountyDem
Mar 2016
#37
No, I do not mean Illinois, Ohio and Florida, because they're not red states.
ColesCountyDem
Mar 2016
#41
My crystal ball is at the dry cleaners, so I'll have to assume you're right.... n/t
ColesCountyDem
Mar 2016
#135
Show us the breakdowns of individual voter preference in the Caucuses...
Blue State Bandit
Mar 2016
#75
Seriously, June is months away and a week in politics is a lifetime. Go Bernie! nt
thereismore
Mar 2016
#2
Enough of this shit already. They should be asking Kasisch that question, not Bernie.
Nyan
Mar 2016
#7
and up by over 20 in Michigan... we know how that turned out! Go Bernie!
FighttheFuture
Mar 2016
#96
Just wait. She has been up that much higher in other states. We haven't really started the
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#23
Psssst - she was up 30 in Michigan too. She was up 20 in Illinois & won by less than 2%
jillan
Mar 2016
#34
Can I just say that Rachel looked like a fool tonite. She's been living in the Comcast Bubble
jillan
Mar 2016
#13
He is so honest about this election. He is truly a great man. I can only vote for him for president
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#18
Those are the cards we've been dealt. We think superdelegates in states that went for Bernie should
Ed Suspicious
Mar 2016
#51
Silly Hill, she should change her name to Hillary Zinton, would that make things fair?
Tarc
Mar 2016
#87
If he wants to stay while it's still mathematically possible to win fair enough.
Bad Dog
Mar 2016
#81
having a competitive primary can help in the general election because it helps build state
Fast Walker 52
Mar 2016
#84
What is that about, BTW are latest threads no longer showing certain threads?
Jackie Wilson Said
Mar 2016
#129
Can you imagine what George Washington would think about the idea of quitting?
Major Hogwash
Mar 2016
#88
As a Californian who votes late in primary season, I agree. I've had my vote voided by a candidate
yurbud
Mar 2016
#89
"Why would you not allow half the people to vote?" he asked. "That is outrageously undemocratic"
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2016
#134
Clinton supporters don't get it because their ideology is about supporting a person.
lumberjack_jeff
Mar 2016
#148