Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

jpak

(41,765 posts)
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 09:42 PM Aug 2016

Court says feds can’t prosecute for medical pot use OKd by state [View all]

Source: sfgate.com

In a potential legal breakthrough for medical marijuana, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that the Justice Department cannot prosecute anyone who grows, supplies or uses the drug for medical purposes under state law because Congress has barred federal intervention.

The decision by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco was written by one of its most conservative judges, Diarmuid O’Scannlain, and was the first by any appeals court to prohibit federal prosecutions under spending restrictions enacted by Congress. First passed in 2014 and renewed through September, the budget amendment forbids the Justice Department to spend any money to prevent California and other states from “implementing their own state laws” that authorize the medical use of marijuana.

The restrictions do not apply to state laws authorizing the personal use of marijuana, which California voters will consider in November. Although the drug remains illegal under federal law, the Obama administration says it has instructed federal prosecutors not to file charges against those who are following state laws.

But prosecutions and other federal actions against state-authorized marijuana suppliers have not ended. The government is still trying to shut down dispensaries, like the huge Harborside Medical Center in Oakland, and has refused to dismiss criminal cases it filed in the past, like those of the medical marijuana retailers and growers in Tuesday’s case.

<more>

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Court-says-feds-can-t-prosecute-for-legal-9146275.php



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good ruling. christx30 Aug 2016 #1
What ruling might be needed for DorothyG Aug 2016 #3
Well, the court would have to rule christx30 Aug 2016 #4
Well I honestly dont foresee SCOTUS ever making a ruling that the federal cstanleytech Aug 2016 #5
Oh I agree completely. christx30 Aug 2016 #7
Well you don't necessarily need a friendly Democratic cstanleytech Aug 2016 #8
excellent! k & r! n/t wildbilln864 Aug 2016 #2
EAT IT DEA! Rex Aug 2016 #6
um TeamPooka Aug 2016 #9
Baby step by baby step StrictlyRockers Aug 2016 #10
Worrisome awoke_in_2003 Aug 2016 #11
No, that isn't what the ruling says . . . markpkessinger Aug 2016 #12
I hope people remember that this is only for medicinal ripcord Aug 2016 #13
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court says feds can’t pro...