Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I saw a very detailed report about this last night on the Lehrer Newshour..... CaliforniaPeggy Aug 2012 #1
This is a huge deal and I wish they exboyfil Aug 2012 #2
this is the second rover SemperEadem Aug 2012 #20
No those were the Spirit and Opportunity exboyfil Aug 2012 #21
You really ought to inform yourself better. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #23
Also, just so you know: Those 2 rovers were designed for a 30 day operational lifespan Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #26
I dont' care what they were designed for SemperEadem Aug 2012 #35
I'm not going to put you on ignore, I'm going to tell you I think you're wrong. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #36
You do know the money itself remains on Earth, right? It wasn't packaged with the lander? (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #37
And even more mind-blowing... Ezlivin Aug 2012 #3
Wow, I never heard that! Canuckistanian Aug 2012 #19
This is exciting! lunatica Aug 2012 #4
I'm excited! hibbing Aug 2012 #5
I'm sure the $2.5 billion spent could be considered a little extravagant magic59 Aug 2012 #6
We probably could have had a manned landing by now..paid for but the Bushie put us so far in debt shraby Aug 2012 #8
We're a long way away from a manned mission to Mars. MrSlayer Aug 2012 #10
The math is already done. boppers Aug 2012 #12
Can you direct me to something that explains the math? MrSlayer Aug 2012 #13
Some resources (my first google hit): boppers Aug 2012 #14
Cool. MrSlayer Aug 2012 #15
We can get to Mars, stay a year, and get back for only $30 Billion. Odin2005 Aug 2012 #17
Yes, I was wrong on this. MrSlayer Aug 2012 #18
I bought that book years ago. Never had a chance to actually read it fujiyama Aug 2012 #32
I suggest we send a manned mission one way, do you think any scientists would be interested in going crimson77 Aug 2012 #25
We piss that much away customerserviceguy Aug 2012 #9
Anyone complaining about NASA's funding needs their perspective checked. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #11
Not this shit again. Odin2005 Aug 2012 #16
Grumble Grumble Grumble Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #22
You must be real fun at parties. crimson77 Aug 2012 #24
NASA spacecraft speeding toward a landing on Mars Judi Lynn Aug 2012 #7
Astonishing image from the rover Cirque du So-What Aug 2012 #27
To boldly go... Octafish Aug 2012 #28
Link to live coverage of the Mars rover landing tawadi Aug 2012 #29
I hope this one is as tough as the little R2D2s, Spirit and Opportunity. Can't wait. Monk06 Aug 2012 #30
Given how much larger it is, if it was that tough it'd crack Mars' crust on landing. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #31
They did it!!!!! Fuck yeah!!!!!!!!! Great job NASA and JPL!!!!!! neverforget Aug 2012 #33
Super yeah!!! truthisfreedom Aug 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mars Rover Approaching Re...»Reply #15